2013
DOI: 10.3354/meps10182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-occurring and opposing freshwater inflow effects on phytoplankton biomass, productivity and community composition of Galveston Bay, USA

Abstract: Ecosystem form and functioning is affected by inflows, a relationship that has long been an interest of aquatic ecologists (Ketchum 1951, 1954, Brook & Woodward 1956). More recently, special sessions at Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) and Association for the Sciences of Limno-logy and Oceanography (ASLO) conferences focused on this topic, with dedicated issues in Journal of Plankton Research (volume 33, 2011) and Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (volume 69, 2012) fol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, most phytoplankton taxa (e.g., diatom, chlorophyte and cryptophyte) can be positively stimulated by fresh inflows due to their relatively rapid growth rate (Paerl et al, 2003). However, Roelke et al (2013) also documented that cyanobacteria and haptophytes in the upper GB were not sensitive to nutrient-rich waters from both rivers due to the extra nutrients obtained from N 2 -fixation abilities and mixotrophic characteristics, respectively. In the lower part of GB, dinoflagellates and cyanobacteria are known to be more dominant during the low-river discharge due to their preference for higher phosphorus (P) compared to some other groups, and to low turbulence (Lee, 2017), and thus are generally inversely related to the fresh inflows (Lee, 2017;Roelke et al, 2013).…”
Section: Response Of Phytoplankton Taxa To Environmental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For instance, most phytoplankton taxa (e.g., diatom, chlorophyte and cryptophyte) can be positively stimulated by fresh inflows due to their relatively rapid growth rate (Paerl et al, 2003). However, Roelke et al (2013) also documented that cyanobacteria and haptophytes in the upper GB were not sensitive to nutrient-rich waters from both rivers due to the extra nutrients obtained from N 2 -fixation abilities and mixotrophic characteristics, respectively. In the lower part of GB, dinoflagellates and cyanobacteria are known to be more dominant during the low-river discharge due to their preference for higher phosphorus (P) compared to some other groups, and to low turbulence (Lee, 2017), and thus are generally inversely related to the fresh inflows (Lee, 2017;Roelke et al, 2013).…”
Section: Response Of Phytoplankton Taxa To Environmental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Effects of river flooding on the coastal carbon cycle, induced by changes in the phytoplankton community, can vary (Roelke et al, 2013;Dorado et al, 2015). Increased inorganic nutrient levels would promote large microphytoplankton, such as diatoms (Shangguan et al, 2017a), since they have a competitive advantage when nutrient inputs are high (Legendre and Rassoulzadegan, 1995;Duarte et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulic replacement time scales ( V/Qr) ranging between 12 and 88 days have been reported in the literature by Santschi [] and Roelke et al . [] based on annual average and extreme river discharge values. We will demonstrate the variability of this time scale and make the conclusion that it is only valid during high river discharge conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%