Co-operatives, territories and social capital: reconsidering a theoretical framework

Abstract

PurposeThis paper promotes a critical approach to co-operative studies by contributing new theoretical insights. The aim is to propose a new view on the co-operative firm as a socioeconomic phenomenon embedded into the local contexts in which it is situated. Sociological and economic analyses have mainly explored the relationship between co-operative members and the organization, the economic performance of co-operatives or compared co-operatives with other firm types. Less attention has been given to the co-operative–territory relation, which can reveal insights into members' collective actions, a co-operative's origins from specific social groups or how they establish relationships with certain community stakeholders over others.Design/methodology/approachThe paper begins with a literature review of academic studies that situate co-operatives in relation to community, with a focus on how social capital theory has been deployed to understand this relation. It then proposes a theoretical examination of two fundamental authors in the field of social capital theory: Robert Putnam and Pierre Bourdieu. Drawing on findings from the literature review and considerations derived from the theoretical dialog between Putnam and Bourdieu, the paper proposes a revised social capital-based framework for analyzing key relations and expected outcomes of the co-operative–territory relation.FindingsReconsidering the role of social capital theory for co-operative studies, this article unfolds a dual reflection. First, it underlines the necessity for research that more closely considers co-operatives' territorial relationships. Second, it critically interrogates and pushes forward social capital theory as a framework for examining the social relations that embed co-operatives and their capacity to activate territorial economies.Originality/valueThe paper highlights the necessity for a further examination of the co-operative–territory relationship. It presents an innovative framework for improving sociological understanding of co-operatives as organizations embedded into their local socioeconomic contexts.

Social Integration as Mediator and Age as Moderator in Social Capital Affecting Mental Health of Internal Migrant Workers: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Modeling Approach

“…In the research on migrant workers, scholars often use Putnam's definition of social capital ( 56 ), arguing that social capital mainly consisted three parts (network, trust, and reciprocity) and divided into two types: cognitive social capital, including trust, reciprocity, etc., which is marked by pronounced individual subjective wishes, and structural social capital, including social participation, socializing frequency and pattern, etc., which is susceptible to objective conditions ( 57 ). Therefore, social capital was measured in this study from two aspects: social trust and social network.…”

Organizational solidarity in practice in Bolivia and Argentina: Building coalitions of resistance and creativity

“…It is in this respect that we can establish a conceptual connection between solidarity in difference and other less-or non-capitalocentric organizations of the economic (work, production) and the socio-cultural (the political). In prior studies we documented how difference(s) may be understood within cooperatives, for instance, as organizations of labor, whereby different modes of production and governance are not used to generate profits and inequality but instead to produce new ways of thinking about how to generate and distribute surplus in more equitable ways (Bianchi and Vieta, 2020;Heras, 2015;Heras and Burin, 2014;Vieta, 2019Vieta, , 2020. We have also identified how coalitions of diverse actors in particular territories join in solidarity to secure access to educational rights (Heras, 2012;Heras and Miano, 2017).…”

Social capital in urban agriculture initiatives

“…The authors deal with collective action, seeing social capital as a characteristic of communities and nations, producing civic engagement. Their approach, however, like Coleman's, is criticized for not considering the context and power relations in the dynamics of networks (Bianchi & Vieta, 2020).…”

“…The concept of social capital currently applied in the social sciences is strongly influenced by the theoretical framework of Bourdieu, Coleman, Lin and Putnam that on the one hand share commonalities, while on the other hand are based on distinct theoretical traditions (Bianchi & Vieta, 2020; Tzanakis, 2013).…”