2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12182-014-0362-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-optimization of carbon dioxide storage and enhanced oil recovery in oil reservoirs using a multi-objective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II)

Abstract: Climate researchers have observed that the carbon dioxide (CO 2) concentration in the atmosphere have been growing significantly over the past century. CO 2 from energy represents about global emissions. Because of impermeable cap rocks hydrocarbon reservoirs are able to sequester CO 2. In addition, due to high-demand for oil worldwide, injection of CO 2 is a useful way to enhance oil 2 storage and oil production is vital. Lack of suitable optimization techniques in the past led most multi-objective optimizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, in the absence of a direct relationship on how to achieve the technical strategy of co-optimizing CO 2 EOR and carbon storage in practice, a second group approached this difficulty by explicitly considering maximizing oil recovery, carbon storage, or a weighted combination of the two objectives using injection strategy techniques [123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130]. Furthermore, a third group of studies considers the economic aspects in the application of co-optimization of CO 2 EOR and carbon storage to honor the co-optimization policy by explicitly considering the maximization of the net present value (NPV) of the project profit or some related performance parameters [131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140].…”
Section: Co 2 -Eor Carbon Storage Compliance: Joint Co-optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, in the absence of a direct relationship on how to achieve the technical strategy of co-optimizing CO 2 EOR and carbon storage in practice, a second group approached this difficulty by explicitly considering maximizing oil recovery, carbon storage, or a weighted combination of the two objectives using injection strategy techniques [123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130]. Furthermore, a third group of studies considers the economic aspects in the application of co-optimization of CO 2 EOR and carbon storage to honor the co-optimization policy by explicitly considering the maximization of the net present value (NPV) of the project profit or some related performance parameters [131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140].…”
Section: Co 2 -Eor Carbon Storage Compliance: Joint Co-optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the mean arithmetic, the objective function was defined by Eq. 2 (Safarzadeh and Motahhari 2014;Heidari and Razmi 2012).…”
Section: Design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the identified CGUS options, CO 2 -enhanced oil recovery (EOR) storage (CO 2 -EOR storage), which is different from the CO 2 -EOR operations traditionally used in Tertiary oil recovery, is a subject of increasing interest because of its overall advantages over other CGS options. CO 2 -EOR storage is essentially a cooptimization process of CO 2 storage and EOR designed to improve oil production simultaneously sequestrating CO 2 [5,6], which can achieve cost advantages and social and economic benefits [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%