2002
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co‐ordination and control of distributed spacecraft systems using convex optimization techniques

Abstract: SUMMARYFormation flying of multiple spacecraft is an enabling technology for many future space science missions. However, the co-ordination and control of these instruments poses many difficult design challenges. This paper presents fuel/time-optimal control algorithms for a co-ordination and control architecture that was designed for a fleet of spacecraft. This architecture includes low-level formation-keeping algorithms and a high-level fleet planner that creates trajectories to re-size or re-target the form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
114
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than using the more commonly used quadratic cost function, to correctly Figure 3 The OSTG safety (a) and terminal (b) constraints encode the minimization of total propellant consumption, the model predictive controller must minimize the absolute sum of -V applied over the prediction horizon [34]. Furthermore, to balance this with time to completion, a terminal constraint enforcing the completion criteria is imposed at the end of the prediction horizon, and the prediction horizon itself is included as a decision variable in the cost function [6,35,36].…”
Section: Orbit Sinchronization Translational Guidance Model Predictivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than using the more commonly used quadratic cost function, to correctly Figure 3 The OSTG safety (a) and terminal (b) constraints encode the minimization of total propellant consumption, the model predictive controller must minimize the absolute sum of -V applied over the prediction horizon [34]. Furthermore, to balance this with time to completion, a terminal constraint enforcing the completion criteria is imposed at the end of the prediction horizon, and the prediction horizon itself is included as a decision variable in the cost function [6,35,36].…”
Section: Orbit Sinchronization Translational Guidance Model Predictivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trajectory optimization formulation in this chapter is presented in the context of linear time-invariant dynamics, but there is no inherent restriction in the formulation preventing the use of time-varying dynamics. 22 Typically, in a rendezvous situation, spacecraft would be in sufficiently close proximity to use Hills equations, 21 but GVEbased approaches 18 can be used for more widely separated situations. Given a chaser satellite whose state is x k at time k where the state x is defined as…”
Section: Online Trajectory Optimization For Autonomous Rendezvousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Model Predictive Control (MPC) is known as an efficient control strategy for the control of industrial processes. The MPC was firstly adopted by Shell oil and knew a continual usage in several fields such as aerospace applications [2], [3], [4]. The significance of this control is due to the consideration of both performance specifications and operating constraints in the elaborated control law.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%