2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2012.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-overexpression of cortactin and CRKII increases migration and invasive potential in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: Cortactin stimulates cell migration, invasion, and experimental metastasis. Overexpression of cortactin has been reported in several human cancers. CRK was originally identified as an oncogene product of v-CRK in a CT10 chicken retrovirus system. Overexpression of CRKII has been reported in several human cancers. CRKII regulates cell migration, morphogenesis, invasion, phagocytosis, and survival; however, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. We evaluated the possibility of the combination of cort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
(127 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the expres-sion of cortactin might be related to OTSCC invasion. These observations are in line with previous studies where cortactin expression was associated with increased invasive ability of OSCC cells and node status [15,34,35]. For example, siRNAmediated knock-down of CTTN was associated with reduced invasion ability of OSCC cells with concomitant modulation of epithelial and decrease in mesenchymal phenotype markers [15,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This indicates that the expres-sion of cortactin might be related to OTSCC invasion. These observations are in line with previous studies where cortactin expression was associated with increased invasive ability of OSCC cells and node status [15,34,35]. For example, siRNAmediated knock-down of CTTN was associated with reduced invasion ability of OSCC cells with concomitant modulation of epithelial and decrease in mesenchymal phenotype markers [15,34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%