2018
DOI: 10.3390/catal8020059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-Processing of Jatropha-Derived Bio-Oil with Petroleum Distillates over Mesoporous CoMo and NiMo Sulfide Catalysts

Abstract: Abstract:The co-processing of an unconventional type of Jatropha bio-oil with petroleum distillates over mesoporous alumina-supported CoMo and NiMo sulfide catalysts (denoted CoMo/γ-Al 2 O 3 and NiMo/γ-Al 2 O 3 ) was studied. Either a stainless-steel high-pressure batch-type reactor or an up-flow fixed-bed reaction system was used under severe reaction conditions (330-350 • C and 5-7 MPa), similar to the conditions of the conventional diesel hydrodesulfurization (HDS) process. To understand the catalytic perfo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is inconsistent with the opinion reported by Topsøe et al [31], who used multiple spectral studies to illustrate the strong interactions between the monolayer and high-surface area alumina via Mo-O-Al linkages located at the edges, thus leading to low catalytic activity. From the above, the change trends of the size of MoS2 slabs and stacks for commercial NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst using the Cs-STEM-HAADF mode are in analogy with previous works by TEM [13][14][15][16], while the observed difference is the variation of "fragment" structures once the catalyst was exposed to harsher reaction conditions from the mild one in this work, which may be partial resource for the larger slabs in Cat C and Cat D. In general, the distinction in overall microstructure variations for the four catalysts is presumably a reflection of the differences in catalytic activity of the NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Note that a precise analysis of the identification of Ni by imaging in the active slabs is not possible in our case owing to complexity of γ-Al 2 O 3 .…”
Section: Structural Variations With the Decreasing Of Catalytic Activitysupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is inconsistent with the opinion reported by Topsøe et al [31], who used multiple spectral studies to illustrate the strong interactions between the monolayer and high-surface area alumina via Mo-O-Al linkages located at the edges, thus leading to low catalytic activity. From the above, the change trends of the size of MoS2 slabs and stacks for commercial NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst using the Cs-STEM-HAADF mode are in analogy with previous works by TEM [13][14][15][16], while the observed difference is the variation of "fragment" structures once the catalyst was exposed to harsher reaction conditions from the mild one in this work, which may be partial resource for the larger slabs in Cat C and Cat D. In general, the distinction in overall microstructure variations for the four catalysts is presumably a reflection of the differences in catalytic activity of the NiMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Note that a precise analysis of the identification of Ni by imaging in the active slabs is not possible in our case owing to complexity of γ-Al 2 O 3 .…”
Section: Structural Variations With the Decreasing Of Catalytic Activitysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Importantly, the smaller probe of Cs-STEM makes it possible to roundly delve the relationship of active phase with respect to their surface structures. Previous studies have shown that the size of the MoS 2 /WS 2 slabs and stacks in hydroprocessing catalysts would be changed under the reaction conditions by the TEM technique [13][14][15][16], and small size MoS 2 may have a better catalytic activity [17]. It is, therefore, still a striking work to exactly track the microstructure variations of NiMo/Al 2 O 3 catalyst during catalysis by the Cs-STEM-HAADF mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selective deoxygenation (SDO) of natural triglycerides over supported noble metals and conventional [Ni(Co)-Mo(W)]/Al 2 O 3 h.d.s. sulphided catalysts, obtained by hydrotreatment, have been extensively studied in recent years [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The SDO is realized by decarboxylation (removal of CO 2 ), decarbonylation (removal of H 2 O and CO) and/or hydrodeoxygenation (removal of H 2 O).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subsequent upgrading of bio-oil through hydrotreating technology using metal catalysts, such as Pd/C, or sulfide catalysts, such as Co-or Ni-promoted MoS 2 /γ-Al 2 O 3 , is required to remove the heteroatoms, resulting in clean and drop-in biofuel with composition and fuel property closed to petro-fuels [22]. Unfortunately, the heteroatoms, water, and unwanted impurities, which are originally present in bio-oil, poison the active sites of metal and sulfide catalysts, causing serious catalyst deactivation, and consequently, reducing the quality of hydrotreated bio-oil [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Yoshimura et al reported that the sulfide NiMo catalysts were deactivated by the oxygen-containing compounds due to the oxidation of active sites [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the upgrading process, the upgrading catalysts, as aforementioned, were immediately deactivated by a high concentration of nitrogen-containing compounds when Jatropha bio-oil was directly used as a feedstock (Scheme 1a). To prevent catalyst deactivation, our previous study demonstrated a co-processing method for the upgrading of Jatropha bio-oil co-fed with petroleum distillates over sulfide CoMo and NiMo catalysts under severe conditions (330-350 • C and 5-7 MPa of H 2 ) [30]. The diesel-like fuel with nearly no heteroatoms (sulfur, oxygen, and nitrogen < 10 ppm) could be obtained by hydrotreating of oil feedstock containing ca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%