Co-producing research with communities: emotions in community research

Abstract

In this article we explore the ways in which universities and communities can work together drawing on our experience of a community-university co-produced project called ‘Imagine’. We reflect on our different experiences of working together and affectively co-produce the article, drawing on a conversation we held together. We locate our discussion within the projects we worked on. We look at the experiences of working across community and university and affectively explore these. We explore the following key questions: How do we work with complexity and difference?Who holds the power in research?What kinds of methods surface hidden voices?How can we co-create equitable research spaces together?What did working together feel like? Our co-writing process surfaces some of these tensions and difficulties as we struggle to place our voices into an academic article. We surface more of our own tensions and voices and this has become one of the dominant experiences of doing co-produced research. We explore the mechanisms of co-production as being both a process of fusion but also its affective qualities. Our discussions show that community partners working with academics have to bear the emotional labour; by ‘standing in the gap’ they are having to move between community and university. We also recognise the power of community co-writing as a form that can open up an opportunity to speak differently, outside the constraining spaces of academia.

Credibility contests: The contributions of experiential knowledge to radicalisation expertise

“…These constraints on diversity in the expert community, alongside the fundamentally contested boundaries of expertise on this topic that mean that there is no one clear, exclusionary notion of authority, reinforce the value of inclusive debates that expand the types of knowledge that are listened to. Finally, while the paper has focused specifically on the struggles of experiential knowledge, and while collaborative approaches to research increasingly attempt to recognise and value such knowledge, the power dynamics within universities themselves and the exclusion of Black, Asian and minority ethnic researchers within academic practice are being increasingly scrutinised (Brown et al, 2020). These issues of power define the experiences that are worth knowing and in turn shape understandings of the topic.…”

The Role and Value of Research Outputs in Coproducing Research With Communities

“…Working with community researchers on a collaborative research project is often a complex relational activity (Brown et al, 2020) that involves "engaging in messy processes of negotiating power structures and diverse values, confronting our academic positionality and risking letting go of outcomes (and outputs) of research" (Darby, 2017, p. 231). The facilitation team decided that it was essential to develop clear and robust methodologies that would support genuine engagement across the research process, including the development of project outputs, while allowing space for individual expertise and knowledge (Teeters & Jurow, 2019).…”

Co-producing ideas, leaders and learning – teaching participatory activism in Stoke-on-Trent

“…Co-production can be described as happening“…in those spaces where you fuse the two together, the university and the community, that produces interesting work … we need to interrogate how power works within those contexts. There are specific issues within universities, and these issues need addressing if community researchers and academics are to work in equitable ways.” (Brown et al, 2020)…”