2022
DOI: 10.4324/9780429328657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-production and Criminal Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any commitment to operationalising the principle of co-production (equal partners and cocreators) in a youth justice setting is hampered by an institutional culture which fixates undue focus on risk management and the use of harm reduction techniques allegedly in line with the principles of a public protection agenda (Johns et al, 2022;Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015;Day, 2022). Accordingly, building connections, establishing trusted partnerships and sustaining reciprocal relationships between children (the powerless) and adult youth justice professionals (the powerholders) as defined by co-production involves great challenges.…”
Section: Operationalising the Principle Of Co-production In Youth Jus...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any commitment to operationalising the principle of co-production (equal partners and cocreators) in a youth justice setting is hampered by an institutional culture which fixates undue focus on risk management and the use of harm reduction techniques allegedly in line with the principles of a public protection agenda (Johns et al, 2022;Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2015;Day, 2022). Accordingly, building connections, establishing trusted partnerships and sustaining reciprocal relationships between children (the powerless) and adult youth justice professionals (the powerholders) as defined by co-production involves great challenges.…”
Section: Operationalising the Principle Of Co-production In Youth Jus...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ways in which co-production is defined also vary, with the term used to refer to a wide range of different "partnership" activities, from participation and collaboration to co-planning, codesign, co-delivery and co-evaluation in research and practice, and even "co-governance" or "co-management" (Verschuere et al, 2012). Accordingly, we see Johns et al's (2022) simple definition of co-production as "equal partnership and for equal benefit" as helpful. This builds on Hanley et al's (2004) continuum of consultation, collaboration and user control, whilst explicitly recognising the power differentials that exist in youth justice settings.…”
Section: Co-productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This builds on Hanley et al's (2004) continuum of consultation, collaboration and user control, whilst explicitly recognising the power differentials that exist in youth justice settings. The question that arises for Johns et al (2022) here is about "who is in partnership, on whose terms, for whose benefit, and 'equal' by whose measure? ", and this seems particularly important in settler-colonial countries such as Australia where the ongoing impact of colonisation continues to shape the experience of First Nations peoples today.…”
Section: Co-productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside the scholarship of convict criminology, which has been critiqued for failing to assimilate into the local academic milieu of Australia (Doyle et al, 2021), lived experience in criminology has not been otherwise conceptualised. Indeed, there has been work published around concepts of "co-production" and "co-design" in criminal justice (Johns et al, 2022) but these insights have been more or less illuminations of practical measures, considerations and benefits, among other things, of involving people with lived experience of the criminal justice system. Not to say that the work of the likes of Johns et al (2022) are unimportant but there is scope to explore lived experience further.…”
Section: Reflections Of a Prisonermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there has been work published around concepts of "co-production" and "co-design" in criminal justice (Johns et al, 2022) but these insights have been more or less illuminations of practical measures, considerations and benefits, among other things, of involving people with lived experience of the criminal justice system. Not to say that the work of the likes of Johns et al (2022) are unimportant but there is scope to explore lived experience further. Whilst it is beyond the remit of this article to comprehensively set out a theoretical framework for lived experience in criminology, a project which I am in the process of accomplishing, the SI could contribute as an overarching guide which frames lived experience of criminal justice interaction, offering a person-centred approach not otherwise brought to light by traditional criminological modes of inquiry.…”
Section: Reflections Of a Prisonermentioning
confidence: 99%