Co-production in healthcare: rhetoric and practice

Abstract

Co-production in healthcare is receiving increasing attention; however, insight into the process of co-production is scarce. This article explores why hospitals involve patients and staff in co-production activities and hospitals' experiences with co-production in practice. A qualitative study with semi-structured interviews (N ¼ 27), observations (70 hours) and document analysis was conducted in five Dutch hospitals, which involved patients and staff in order to improve services. The results show that hospitals have different motives to involve patients and staff and have adapted existing methods to involve patients. Interestingly, areas of improvement proposed by patients were often already known. However, the process of co-production did contribute to quality improvement in other ways. The process of coproduction stimulated hospitals' thinking about how to realize quality improvements. Quality improvements were facilitated by this process as seeing patients and hearing their experiences created a sense of urgency among staff to act on the improvement issues raised. Moreover, the experiences served to legitimatize improvements to higher management bodies. Points for practitionersDifferent participation methods can bring patients' experiences with healthcare services to the fore, which can be used for quality improvement. Our study shows that adapting existing methods to local hospital resources is likely to be beneficial for co-production processes within a given context. However, adapting and tailoring also poses risks. Tailoring activities, such as using criteria to select patients, influence what is considered to be legitimate patient input. In addition, as the co-production process is important, the method should consist of an organized trajectory in which patients and staff are

Contemporary consumer perspectives on prostate cancer survivorship: Fifty voices

“…Traditional forms of encouraging consumer participation through “patient voice” and “patient choice” are important but not enough by themselves to challenge and change the dominant health system model . Achieving system‐wide co‐production of health care delivery requires going beyond solely seeking “patient voice” and facilitating “patient choice,” to actively positioning consumers as co‐producers of health services and systems …”

Making infection prevention and control everyone's business? Hospital staff views on patient involvement

“…Co‐production in health care has patient involvement at its heart, recognizing the equal importance of both professional and patient knowledge in coming together to ensure that the service meets the needs of the user, and to improve the quality of care provided . Co‐production has its origins in two main camps—(a) the democratic ideal that emphasizes citizen rights and the “co‐production of public good” and (b) the shift away from viewing patients as passive recipients of health care to more informed engaged participants in the health‐care process .…”

Technocratic recentralization in the French health care system: A critical evaluation

“…Despite being a powerful improvement mechanism and the belief that citizens should have a critical role in monitoring public accountability, mechanisms of patient participation are lacking in France more than in many other countries. French patients are not as organized as in the United States and therefore cannot influence reform trajectory.…”