Climate Risk in Africa 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61160-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-production: Learning from Contexts

Abstract: Given that climate change is a complex, systemic risk, addressing it requires new knowledge. One way of generating such new knowledge is through co-production, or collaborative development by a range of stakeholders with diverse backgrounds embedded in trans-disciplinary processes. This chapter reflects on emerging experiences of co-producing decision-relevant climate information to enable climate-resilient planning and adaptation to climate change in Africa. It outlines principles that have emerged and evolve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, achieving truly inclusive processes and demonstrating such 'co-productive agility' is often challenging. Bringing together different parties means that differential power relations are going to have to be addressed, and the importance of recognising positionality and its role in the process and ensuring reflexivity has been highlighted (Vincent et al, 2018(Vincent et al, , 2021. However, this is often overlooked.…”
Section: Explicitly Recognising Power In Co-productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, achieving truly inclusive processes and demonstrating such 'co-productive agility' is often challenging. Bringing together different parties means that differential power relations are going to have to be addressed, and the importance of recognising positionality and its role in the process and ensuring reflexivity has been highlighted (Vincent et al, 2018(Vincent et al, , 2021. However, this is often overlooked.…”
Section: Explicitly Recognising Power In Co-productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional expectations, combined with time constraints imposed upon grant-funded initiatives (Newcomb et al 2021), may limit the development and/or sustainability of long-term relationships between researchers and stakeholders (Church et al 2022), further confounding collaborative research processes and outcomes (Worosz et al 2022). Therefore, collaborative research designs should strive to match engagement modality and intensity to the goals of the research, recognizing that while stakeholders' deeply held values change slowly, their preferences for policy solutions may be influenced over shorter timescales through social learning (Vincent et al 2021(Vincent et al , 2018Slater and Robinson 2020;Gerlak et al 2019;Djenontin and Meadow 2018) and deliberative knowledge exchange (Koebele 2020;Meadow et al 2015). Similarly, engagement must be organized and implemented at a spatial scale relevant to the research problems and ecological system where decisionmaking authority occurs (Wyborn and Bixler 2013).…”
Section: Designing a Collaborative Research Framework (Crf) For Snowpacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This guided regular meetings between the ‘Institut International d’Ingénierie de l’Eau et de l’Environnement’ (2iE— www.2ie-edu.org ) and technically focused Ouagadougou decision-makers operating within the Ministry of Urbanism (MoU) and local Mayor’s office to enable engagement and identify decision-making contexts relating to resilient urban flood policy and planning. A technical workshop (2018) involved technical presentation and open-table discussion between scientists and local mayors and decision-makers using a science café model (Vincent et al 2021 ). This directed a scientific focus towards using high-resolution data and developing design storms and flood maps suitable for flood risk assessment and directly informed the development of the modelling chain presented in this paper.…”
Section: Co-production Of Climate Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%