2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-production of high-gravity bioethanol and succinic acid from potassium peroxymonosulfate and deacetylation sequentially pretreated sugarcane bagasse by simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a general phenomenon was observed that a random selection of high solid loading for SSF was performed to boost ethanol concentration without statistical reasons. 6 , 15 , 22 , 23 Therefore, avoiding the selection of the solid loading for enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation groundlessly is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a general phenomenon was observed that a random selection of high solid loading for SSF was performed to boost ethanol concentration without statistical reasons. 6 , 15 , 22 , 23 Therefore, avoiding the selection of the solid loading for enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation groundlessly is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies, including Tween 80 addition, specific bioreactor, size reduction, and fed-batch fermentation, have been investigated to block the negative interaction between lignin with cellulase and enhance enzymatic saccharification and microbial digestion at high solid loading. However, a general phenomenon was observed that a random selection of high solid loading for SSF was performed to boost ethanol concentration without statistical reasons. ,,, Therefore, avoiding the selection of the solid loading for enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation groundlessly is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SHCF using Saccharomyces cerevisiae (MTCC-36) and Pichia stipitis (NCIM-3498) produced 14.25 g/L (0.1425 g/g) bioethanol at 30°C, 24 h, and pH 5.0 (under static conditions). Bu et al in a study using sugarcane bagasse achieved 0.36-g/g ethanol yield from its holocellulose [57]. The efficiency of bioethanol production process using DS as LB source was found to be 95.68% based on the TRS conversion efficiency.…”
Section: Mass/materials Balance During Bioethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sanchez et al obtained a bioethanol yield of 17.1 g/L using the SHF and 15.0 g/L using the SSF with 1 × 10 7 cell/mL of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and an enzyme loading of 25 FPU/g using pine (Pinus pseudostrobus L.) sawdust as substrate [56]. In another study, a very high-ethanol titer of 120.77 g/L and a fermentation efficiency of 79.01% were achieved at the enzyme loading of 15 FPU/g substrate using sugarcane bagasse by the SHCF [57]. Once the yeast cells have achieved sufficient biomass, their metabolic functions are diverted towards bioethanol production in the presence of fermentable sugars in the medium (29.20 g/L).…”
Section: Separate Hydrolysis and Co-fermentation For Bioethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This culturing method is indispensable when, for example, a substrate used in high concentrations has an inhibiting effect on the cultured microorganism and the productivity of the process (the ratio of the amount of product formed to the amount of substrate consumed) does not allow a desirable concentration of succinic acid to be produced from the initially added substrate [14][15][16]. A new approach involves the co-production of succinic acid and ethanol by simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation [17]. However, in this process, alcohol accounted for the large majority of the product, 120 g/L, while the succinic acid concentration was 34.84 g/L.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%