2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-sequestration of SO2 with supercritical CO2 in carbonates: An experimental study of capillary trapping, relative permeability, and capillary pressure

Abstract: In this study we performed three categories of steady-and unsteady-state 8 core-flooding experiments to investigate capillary trapping, relative perme-9 ability, and capillary pressure, in a scCO 2 +SO 2 /brine/limestone system at 10 elevated temperature and pressure conditions, i.e., 60 • C and 19.16 MPa. We 11 used a Madison limestone core sample acquired from the Rock Springs Uplift 12 in southwest Wyoming. We carried out two sets of steady-state drainage-13 imbibition relative permeability experiments with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stability of a residually trapped non‐wetting phase over several hours has been well documented [e.g., Akbarabadi and Piri , ; Krevor et al ., ; Lu et al ., ; Niu et al ., ], and the resilience of the residually trapped phase to further displacement observed in Figure is thus consistent. Most two‐phase core flooding experiments in the literature are targeted at determining relative permeability trends [e.g., Burnside and Naylor , ; Reynolds and Krevor , ] and the injection regimes typically used correspond to the associated techniques for relative permeability measurements (i.e., steady state, un‐steady state etc .)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of a residually trapped non‐wetting phase over several hours has been well documented [e.g., Akbarabadi and Piri , ; Krevor et al ., ; Lu et al ., ; Niu et al ., ], and the resilience of the residually trapped phase to further displacement observed in Figure is thus consistent. Most two‐phase core flooding experiments in the literature are targeted at determining relative permeability trends [e.g., Burnside and Naylor , ; Reynolds and Krevor , ] and the injection regimes typically used correspond to the associated techniques for relative permeability measurements (i.e., steady state, un‐steady state etc .)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inlet brine saturations were used to characterize the capillary pressure versus saturation relationships (Ramakrishnan & Capiello ). Detailed information regarding the experimental procedures and conditions is presented elsewhere (Akbarabadi & Piri ). Results are illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short term, storage capacity is controlled by structural and capillary trappings [ Bandara et al ., ], which are governed by capillary pressure, because capillary pressure between CO 2 and water (or other fluids) phases entraps both connected CO 2 plume below the caprock and disconnected CO 2 bubbles in formation pores [ Krevor et al ., ]. Also, capillary pressure contributes to the safer long‐term trapping mechanisms by solubility and mineral trapping [ Akbarabadi and Piri , ]. Capillary pressure between CO 2 and water in GCS can be explained by the Young‐Laplace equation as below: PC =PCO2Pwater = 2γWCO2cos true(θtrue)R where P C is capillary pressure, PCO2 is CO 2 pressure, P wate r is water pressure, γ CO 2 ‐water is the water‐CO 2 interfacial tension, θ is the water contact angle on mineral surface, and R is pore radius.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%