2019
DOI: 10.2741/4710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-signaling receptors regulate T-cell plasticity and immune tolerance

Abstract: We took an experimental database mining analysis to determine the expression of 28 co-signaling receptors in 32 human tissues in physiological/pathological conditions. We made the following significant findings: 1) co-signaling receptors are differentially expressed in tissues; 2) heart, trachea, kidney, mammary gland and muscle express co-signaling receptors that mediate CD4 + T cell functions such as priming, differentiation, effector, and memory; 3) urinary tumor, germ cell tumor, leukemia and chondrosarcom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Mφs are prototypic professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that modulate CD4+ T cell activation by providing T cell activation signal #1 and co-stimulation/co-inhibition-based signal #2(50), we also examined the expression of 28 T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition (immune checkpoint) receptors (23), including 14 co-stimulation receptors, 10 co-inhibition receptors, and 4 dual-functional (both co-stimulation and co-inhibition) receptors in tissue Mφ (Figure 3A), as we reported previously (49). As shown in Figure 3A, we found that: (i) the Mφ from LLSI express co-inhibition receptor CD274 (programmed death-ligand 1, PDL1) in much higher levels than ATMφ and (ii) the Mφ from peritoneum and ATMφ express lower levels of CD274 than BM Mφ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Since Mφs are prototypic professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that modulate CD4+ T cell activation by providing T cell activation signal #1 and co-stimulation/co-inhibition-based signal #2(50), we also examined the expression of 28 T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition (immune checkpoint) receptors (23), including 14 co-stimulation receptors, 10 co-inhibition receptors, and 4 dual-functional (both co-stimulation and co-inhibition) receptors in tissue Mφ (Figure 3A), as we reported previously (49). As shown in Figure 3A, we found that: (i) the Mφ from LLSI express co-inhibition receptor CD274 (programmed death-ligand 1, PDL1) in much higher levels than ATMφ and (ii) the Mφ from peritoneum and ATMφ express lower levels of CD274 than BM Mφ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It has been reported that a Treg-specific deficiency of cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) results in development of systemic lymphoproliferation, fatal autoimmune disease, hyperproduction of immunoglobulin E, and potent tumor immunity ( 130 ). Our previous report determined the expression of 28 co-signaling receptors in 32 human tissues in physiological/pathological conditions and found that the expression of inflammasome components are correlated with the expression of co-signaling receptors ( 19 ). We also reported that among 10 immune checkpoint receptors (ICRs), lung, liver, spleen and intestine macrophages (Mφ) and bone marrow (BM) Mφ express higher levels of CD274 (programmed cell death-1, PDL-1) than adipose tissue Mφ, presumably to counteract the M1 Mφ dominant status via its reverse signaling behavior ( 1 ), suggesting that tissue immune checkpoint receptor signaling may also modulate Tregs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immune responses including innate immune macrophages ( 1 ), antigen-specific responses ( 2 13 ), CD4 + Foxp3 + regulatory T cells (Treg) ( 14 18 ) and cosignaling- and immune checkpoint receptors ( 19 ) play significant roles in suppressing tumor growth and development. Although cancer immunotherapy is very promising ( 10 , 20 ), new anti-cancer drugs and vaccines fail to show promising benefits against cancer, which is at least partially due to the infiltration of Treg into the tumor region and suppression of anti-cancer activities of the drugs and vaccines ( 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, while miR155 -/mice exhibited fewer CD95 + CD86macrophages than WT mice (Supplementary Figure 4D), these mice had a higher percentage of CD95 + CD86macrophages at this extended time point compared with 12-week HFD. We recently reported that many of 28 T cell co-stimulatory receptors (CSRs), such as CD40, 4-1BBL, TL1A, CD30L, SLAM, CD48, SEMA4A, B7-1 (CD80), B7-2 (CD86), and CD155, are significantly upregulated in M1 macrophage polarization (47). This suggests a possibility that missing single CSR CD86, macrophages could still be polarized into pro-inflammatory macrophages such as CD95 + CD86macrophages as demonstrated here; and that although Fas/CD95 induces apoptosis, CD40 expressed in M1 macrophages may rescue pro-inflammatory macrophages from CD95-mediated apoptosis, as reported in B cells (48).…”
Section: High-fat Diet-fed Dko Mice (Metabolically Healthy Obesity Stmentioning
confidence: 99%