2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20540-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-stimulation with opposing macrophage polarization cues leads to orthogonal secretion programs in individual cells

Abstract: Macrophages are innate immune cells that contribute to fighting infections, tissue repair, and maintaining tissue homeostasis. To enable such functional diversity, macrophages resolve potentially conflicting cues in the microenvironment via mechanisms that are unclear. Here, we use single-cell RNA sequencing to explore how individual macrophages respond when co-stimulated with inflammatory stimuli LPS and IFN-γ and the resolving cytokine IL-4. These co-stimulated macrophages display a distinct global transcrip… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are less likely to express M2 markers ( Figure 4F). When it comes to M2 cells (Path 6), the pair-wise expression correlations are not as strong ( Figure S3C), as previously reported (Muñoz-Rojas et al, 2021). This suggests that terminally polarized M1 present a stronger phenotype and are less likely to express M2 markers.…”
Section: M1 Macrophages More Strongly Express Polarization Markers Thsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…are less likely to express M2 markers ( Figure 4F). When it comes to M2 cells (Path 6), the pair-wise expression correlations are not as strong ( Figure S3C), as previously reported (Muñoz-Rojas et al, 2021). This suggests that terminally polarized M1 present a stronger phenotype and are less likely to express M2 markers.…”
Section: M1 Macrophages More Strongly Express Polarization Markers Thsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Importantly, we provide experimental evidence that MFs launch biased polarization programs in the different phases of CC, using two of the main polarization signals (IL-4 and IFNG). MF polarization by these and many other cytokines have been extensively studied, yet these studies have not implicated CC as a factor that can alter MF plasticity or immune functions [22, 23, 26, 27, 29, 55]. Strikingly, we report that the M1 polarization program is strongly restricted to the G1-phase of CC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Reciprocal suppression of enhancers of conflicting programs thus ensures mutual exclusion of incompatible biological properties and preserves the identity of costimulated cells. On the other hand, groups of genes induced by antagonistic pathways, such as those triggered by LPS or PGE 2 , can co-exist in single cells, as also shown recently (Muñ oz-Rojas et al, 2021). The ''mixed'' phenotypes of costimulated macrophages are incompatible with dogmatic definitions of polarization states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%