“…CO 2 capture and storage from large emission sources, such as flue gas and natural gas, has already been considered as the immediate and effective solution to delay the rapidly rising air temperature. − Compared with other carbon capture technologies, such as amine scrubbing and membrane separation, solid adsorption has the advantages of low energy penalty, simple equipment and separation process, and no secondary pollution. , Among various materials, amine-containing solids have been considered as the most promising candidates because of their high adsorption capacity, high selectivity, and low desorption temperature. , For instance, the thermal energy requirement and cost of a polyethyleneimine (PEI)/silica-based adsorption system are 2.46 GJ and $24.5 per metric ton of CO 2 , − whereas the corresponding thermal energy and cost of a 30% monoethanolamine absorption system are 3.90 GJ/tCO 2 , and $70, respectively . These advantages can be associated with the optimum equilibrium conversion between adsorption and desorption.…”