2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0se01059f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 methanation over Ni–Al and Co–Al LDH-derived catalysts: the role of basicity

Abstract: Ni-Al and Co-Al mixed oxides derived from hydrotalcites were prepared by coprecipitation and evaluated in CO2 methanation. The catalysts were characterized by N2 physisorption, XRD, H2-TPR, NH3-TPD, CO2-TPD, TPO and...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peaks at around 360 °C and 500 °C were associated with two reduction processes of Co 3 O 4 to CoO and CoO to Co, respectively. The third peak at high reduction temperature appeared at around 700 °C, which could be explained by the fact that the formation of well‐dispersed CoO x species in the pore channel or the formation of CoAl 2 O 4 under calcination step [17,28] . In addition, the reduction peaks of Co 3 O 4 ‐Al 2 O 3 @USY and Co 3 O 4 ‐Al 2 O 3 catalysts were shifted towards higher temperatures compared with Co 3 O 4 /USY catalyst, which made it clear that the stronger interaction between Co and the support was formed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peaks at around 360 °C and 500 °C were associated with two reduction processes of Co 3 O 4 to CoO and CoO to Co, respectively. The third peak at high reduction temperature appeared at around 700 °C, which could be explained by the fact that the formation of well‐dispersed CoO x species in the pore channel or the formation of CoAl 2 O 4 under calcination step [17,28] . In addition, the reduction peaks of Co 3 O 4 ‐Al 2 O 3 @USY and Co 3 O 4 ‐Al 2 O 3 catalysts were shifted towards higher temperatures compared with Co 3 O 4 /USY catalyst, which made it clear that the stronger interaction between Co and the support was formed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The third peak at high reduction temperature appeared at around 700 °C, which could be explained by the fact that the formation of well-dispersed CoO x species in the pore channel or the formation of CoAl 2 O 4 under calcination step. [17,28] In addition, the reduction peaks of Co 3 O 4 -Al 2 O 3 @USY and Co 3 O 4 -Al 2 O 3 catalysts were shifted towards higher temperatures compared with Co 3 O 4 /USY catalyst, which made it clear that the stronger interaction between Co and the support was formed. The strong interaction was proved to be caused by the formation of the LDH structure, which could facilitate the formation of Table 1.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…60,61 The NiAl 2 O 4 phase at 45 has probably been overlapped by the NiO signal at 43.3 . 62 The presence of Cu into Ni-C was confirmed in the diffractograms of both Cu-WC and Cu-FC samples, by reflections at 2θ = 35.7 , 38.5 , 48.8 , 58.2 , and 61.4 which correspond to CuO. 63,64 The reduced catalysts in Figure 3A,B show peaks at 44.6 and 52 assigned to the Ni phase.…”
Section: Catalyst's Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…63,64 The reduced catalysts in Figure 3A,B show peaks at 44.6 and 52 assigned to the Ni phase. 62 In addition, the Cu-FR e Cu-WR samples present two other narrow peaks with greater intensity at 43. From reference.…”
Section: Catalyst's Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The catalytic tests were carried out in a system previously described, composed by a fixed‐bed tubular quartz reactor, an electric resistive furnace, and digital mass controllers (Sierra Instruments) 17,33,34,41 . The outlet gases were analyzed online in a Varian 3600 Cx gas chromatograph equipped with thermal conductivity detector using N 2 as carrier gas and a Porapak‐Q column.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%