2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-021-02173-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-substrate facilitated charge transfer for bioelectricity evolution in a toxic blue-green alga-fed microbial fuel cell technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, single substrate feeding is often conventionally favored in biotechnological applications, it could lead to multiple metabolic constraints, mainly due to the fine coordination required to simultaneously balance global cell metabolism, growth and overproduction of target compounds ( Babel, 2009 ; Liu, Santala and Stephanopoulos, 2020 ; Hartline et al, 2021 ). On the other hand, several experimental efforts have already demonstrated that is possible overcome these limitations by adopting metabolite doping or co-substrate feeding, accordingly with particular metabolic engineering applications ( Papazi et al, 2012 ; Anfelt et al, 2015 ; Liu et al, 2019a ; Park et al, 2019 ; Gu et al, 2020 ; Ndayisenga et al, 2021 ), in agreement with the present work. Additionally, thanks to the very poor nutritional requirements of cyanobacteria, the BG11 growth medium is still suitable for further supplementation, in the light of large-scale application.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although, single substrate feeding is often conventionally favored in biotechnological applications, it could lead to multiple metabolic constraints, mainly due to the fine coordination required to simultaneously balance global cell metabolism, growth and overproduction of target compounds ( Babel, 2009 ; Liu, Santala and Stephanopoulos, 2020 ; Hartline et al, 2021 ). On the other hand, several experimental efforts have already demonstrated that is possible overcome these limitations by adopting metabolite doping or co-substrate feeding, accordingly with particular metabolic engineering applications ( Papazi et al, 2012 ; Anfelt et al, 2015 ; Liu et al, 2019a ; Park et al, 2019 ; Gu et al, 2020 ; Ndayisenga et al, 2021 ), in agreement with the present work. Additionally, thanks to the very poor nutritional requirements of cyanobacteria, the BG11 growth medium is still suitable for further supplementation, in the light of large-scale application.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, single substrate feeding is conventionally preferred but naturally elicits stoichiometric constraints on available carbon atoms, energy and redox state, leading to metabolic imbalance, when a specific route has to be exploited. Also, in cyanobacterial and microalgal cultivations, co-substrate feeding or nutrient modulation strategies have been adopted ( Papazi et al, 2012 ; Anfelt et al, 2015 ; Ndayisenga et al, 2021 ). In comparison to carbohydrate-using microorganisms, cyanobacteria may represent a more sustainable alternative because, drawing energy from photosynthesis, they avoid expensive fermentable sugars as carbon feedstock and can be exploited for CO 2 capture and conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A renewable energy approach may employ proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) (Tongphanpharn et al 2021; Chidanand and Eswara Prasad 2021), in particular microbial fuel cells (MFCs) (Ndayisenga et al 2021). PEMFCs have an estimated market of US$2.10 billion in 2021 up to US$22.74 billion in 2028(Fortune Business Insights 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%