2018
DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1465134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-teaching perspectives from middle school algebra co-teachers and their students with and without disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicated that there were no significant differences in the use of co-teaching in relation to school level, region or size. This conflicts with earlier Finnish studies, where results showed that classroom teachers in primary schools co-taught more often than subject teachers in secondary schools (Saloviita, 2018;Saloviita & Takala, 2010;Takala & Uusitalo-Malmivaara, 2012), despite international research showing that students in higher grades particularly benefit from co-teaching and that they appreciate co-teaching as a support strategy (King-Sears et al, 2018;Rea et al, 2002;Rivera et al, 2014;Wilson & Michaels, 2006). The present finding -namely, that the amount of time devoted to co-teaching was similar among respondents in primary and lower secondary schools -is therefore surprising.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results indicated that there were no significant differences in the use of co-teaching in relation to school level, region or size. This conflicts with earlier Finnish studies, where results showed that classroom teachers in primary schools co-taught more often than subject teachers in secondary schools (Saloviita, 2018;Saloviita & Takala, 2010;Takala & Uusitalo-Malmivaara, 2012), despite international research showing that students in higher grades particularly benefit from co-teaching and that they appreciate co-teaching as a support strategy (King-Sears et al, 2018;Rea et al, 2002;Rivera et al, 2014;Wilson & Michaels, 2006). The present finding -namely, that the amount of time devoted to co-teaching was similar among respondents in primary and lower secondary schools -is therefore surprising.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…This, since co-teaching involves a redirection of special education knowledge towards the classroom. Instead of referring certain pupils to an intensive special education service outside of the regular classroom, the SET brings his or her competence into the regular classroom (Friend et al, 2010;King-Sears, Jenkins, & Brawand, 2018;Scruggs & Mastropieri, 2017). Another central benefit conferred by co-teaching that supports inclusive education is the increased teacher-pupil ratio, which improves teachers' abilities to differentiate between students and meet individual needs without excluding pupils (Friend et al, 2010;Krammer, Gastner, Paleczek, Gasteiger-Klicpera, & Rossman, 2018).…”
Section: Co-teaching As An Inclusive Teaching Strategy: the Benefits And Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One-teach/one-assist and one-teach/one-observe are the most widely used co-teaching models (Scruggs, Mastropieri, & McDuffie, 2007; Strogilos, Stefanidis, & Tragoulia, 2016). The role of the assisting or observing teacher has been described as the support role (King-Sears, Jenkins, & Brawand, 2018; Solis, Vaughn, Swanson, & McCulley, 2012), often filled by the special educator (Hang & Rabren, 2009). For this article, the one-teach/one-assist and one-teach/one-observe models are combined and referred to as a “one-teach/one-support model,” with the teacher not leading instruction in the support role.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%