2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32100-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO-tolerant RuNi/TiO2 catalyst for the storage and purification of crude hydrogen

Abstract: Hydrogen storage by means of catalytic hydrogenation of suitable organic substrates helps to elevate the volumetric density of hydrogen energy. In this regard, utilizing cheaper industrial crude hydrogen to fulfill the goal of hydrogen storage would show economic attraction. However, because CO impurities in crude hydrogen can easily deactivate metal active sites even in trace amounts such a process has not yet been realized. Here, we develop a robust RuNi/TiO2 catalyst that enables the efficient hydrogenation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CO adsorption on Ru/CeO 2 yielded a dominating IR band at 2066 cm –1 and a wide signal at 1980 cm –1 , which were ascribed to the multicarbonyl adsorbed on oxidized Ru sites as [Ru n + –(CO) x ] and the linearly bound CO on the Ru site at the Ru–CeO 2 interface, respectively. For the monometallic Ni catalyst, no CO adsorption bands remained after desorption, indicating that the interaction between Ni and CO is poor . Interestingly, a significant red shift of the CO adsorption band on the Ru site occurred from 0.2Ru (2066 cm –1 ) to 20Ni0.2Ru samples (2053 cm –1 ), indicating the higher electronegativity of Ru species in 20Ni0.2Ru samples as a result of electron transfer from Ni to Ru, which agrees well with the XPS data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CO adsorption on Ru/CeO 2 yielded a dominating IR band at 2066 cm –1 and a wide signal at 1980 cm –1 , which were ascribed to the multicarbonyl adsorbed on oxidized Ru sites as [Ru n + –(CO) x ] and the linearly bound CO on the Ru site at the Ru–CeO 2 interface, respectively. For the monometallic Ni catalyst, no CO adsorption bands remained after desorption, indicating that the interaction between Ni and CO is poor . Interestingly, a significant red shift of the CO adsorption band on the Ru site occurred from 0.2Ru (2066 cm –1 ) to 20Ni0.2Ru samples (2053 cm –1 ), indicating the higher electronegativity of Ru species in 20Ni0.2Ru samples as a result of electron transfer from Ni to Ru, which agrees well with the XPS data.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For the monometallic Ni catalyst, no CO adsorption bands remained after desorption, indicating that the interaction between Ni and CO is poor. 38 Interestingly, a significant red shift of the CO adsorption band on the Ru site occurred from 0.2Ru (2066 cm −1 ) to 20Ni0.2Ru samples (2053 cm −1 ), indicating the higher electronegativity of Ru species in 20Ni0.2Ru samples as a result of electron transfer from Ni to Ru, which agrees well with the XPS data.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the monometallic catalysts, significant interactions between Ni and Ru can be observed in all bimetallic samples, where the Ru reduction peaks shift to higher temperatures while the Ni ones all shift to lower temperatures in H 2 -TPR. 37,39,40 Among them, the strongest Ni and Ru interaction is observed on Ru@Ni/TiO 2 . However, rather than a continuous peak as in the case of Ni–Ru solid solution formation, there is a shoulder peak centred at around 373 °C for Ni@Ru/TiO 2 , which can be attributed to the reduction of interfacial RuO x –TiO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our additional case studies show this low-damage HAADF-STEM imaging technique is not restricted to the low-loading Cu/ZSM-5 catalysts (Figure S37, S38 and Notes S8, Supporting Information) but applicable for the exploration of intrinsic structures of more beam-sensitive catalytic materials (Figure S39, S40 and Notes S9, Supporting Information). [34]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%