Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Working memory difficulties are common, debilitating, and may pose barriers to recovery for people who use methamphetamine. Yet, little is known regarding the neural dysfunctions accompanying these difficulties. Here, we acquired cross‐sectional, functional magnetic resonance imaging while people with problematic methamphetamine‐use experience (MA+, n = 65) and people without methamphetamine‐use experience (MA−, n = 44) performed a parametric n‐back task (0‐back through 2‐back). Performance on tasks administered outside of the scanner, together with n‐back performance, afforded to determine a latent dimension of participants' working memory ability. Behavioural results indicated that MA+ participants exhibited lower scores on this dimension compared to MA− participants (d = −1.39, p < .001). Whole‐brain imaging results also revealed that MA+ participants exhibited alterations in load‐induced responses predominantly in frontoparietal and default‐mode areas. Specifically, while the MA− group exhibited monotonic activation increases within frontoparietal areas and monotonic decreases within default‐mode areas from 0‐back to 2‐back, MA+ participants showed a relative attenuation of these load‐induced activation patterns (d = −1.55, p < .001). Moreover, increased activations in frontoparietal areas from 0‐ to 2‐back were related to greater working memory ability among MA+ participants (r = .560, p = .004). No such effects were observed for default‐mode areas. In sum, reductions in working memory ability were observed alongside load‐induced dysfunctions in frontoparietal and default‐mode areas for people with problematic methamphetamine‐use experience. Among them, load‐induced activations within frontoparietal areas were found to have a strong and specific relationship to individual differences in working memory ability, indicating a putative neural signature of the working memory difficulties associated with chronic methamphetamine use.
Working memory difficulties are common, debilitating, and may pose barriers to recovery for people who use methamphetamine. Yet, little is known regarding the neural dysfunctions accompanying these difficulties. Here, we acquired cross‐sectional, functional magnetic resonance imaging while people with problematic methamphetamine‐use experience (MA+, n = 65) and people without methamphetamine‐use experience (MA−, n = 44) performed a parametric n‐back task (0‐back through 2‐back). Performance on tasks administered outside of the scanner, together with n‐back performance, afforded to determine a latent dimension of participants' working memory ability. Behavioural results indicated that MA+ participants exhibited lower scores on this dimension compared to MA− participants (d = −1.39, p < .001). Whole‐brain imaging results also revealed that MA+ participants exhibited alterations in load‐induced responses predominantly in frontoparietal and default‐mode areas. Specifically, while the MA− group exhibited monotonic activation increases within frontoparietal areas and monotonic decreases within default‐mode areas from 0‐back to 2‐back, MA+ participants showed a relative attenuation of these load‐induced activation patterns (d = −1.55, p < .001). Moreover, increased activations in frontoparietal areas from 0‐ to 2‐back were related to greater working memory ability among MA+ participants (r = .560, p = .004). No such effects were observed for default‐mode areas. In sum, reductions in working memory ability were observed alongside load‐induced dysfunctions in frontoparietal and default‐mode areas for people with problematic methamphetamine‐use experience. Among them, load‐induced activations within frontoparietal areas were found to have a strong and specific relationship to individual differences in working memory ability, indicating a putative neural signature of the working memory difficulties associated with chronic methamphetamine use.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.