2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2486-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Clustering analysis refers to the clustering of some keywords with strong cooccurrence intensity. Co-words analysis is mainly used in the fields of artificial intelligence (Courtial and Law 1989;Bullinaria and Levy 2007), scientific metrology (Lamnabhilagarrigue et al 2017;Olmedagomez et al 2017), materials science (Linnenluecke et al 2017), medical science (Buchwald et al 2004;Chowdhury et al 2014), and economics (Topalli and Ivanaj 2016;Bracco et al 2018).…”
Section: Social Network Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustering analysis refers to the clustering of some keywords with strong cooccurrence intensity. Co-words analysis is mainly used in the fields of artificial intelligence (Courtial and Law 1989;Bullinaria and Levy 2007), scientific metrology (Lamnabhilagarrigue et al 2017;Olmedagomez et al 2017), materials science (Linnenluecke et al 2017), medical science (Buchwald et al 2004;Chowdhury et al 2014), and economics (Topalli and Ivanaj 2016;Bracco et al 2018).…”
Section: Social Network Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a network of keywords, a compound of community detection, network analysis, and strategic diagrams are depicted to detect interesting trends and patterns within a complex keyword interaction network and reveal the conceptual structure of a research field (Callon et al, 1991 ). The method has been widely utilized in various areas like urbanization (Zhang et al, 2017 ), supply chain management (Shiau et al, 2015 ), library and information science (Olmeda-Gómez et al, 2017 ), the Internet of Things (Yan et al, 2015 ), marketing (Z. Wang et al, 2015 ), social media (Gan & Wang, 2015 ), scientometrics (Ravikumar et al, 2015 ), non-biomedical modalities (Nguyen, 2019 ), medical tourism research (Hoz-Correa et al, 2018 ), child-computer interaction (Giannakos et al, 2020 ), energy (Wu & Leu, 2014 ), open data (Corrales-Garay et al, 2019 ), recommendation systems (Hu & Zhang, 2015 ), gender differences (Dehdarirad et al, 2014 ), and epidemiology (Baziyad et al, 2020 ). Some papers have also utilized co-word analysis in coronavirus research areas.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, there are studies for foreign language papers [2] [3] [4], Chinese journal papers [5] [6] [7], and studies for the National Social Science Foundation projects [8] [9]. The identification of research themes in the field of library intelligence has been carried out earlier abroad, and more types of hot research analysis methods are used: content analysis [10], LDA theme analysis [11] [12], co-word analysis [13] [14] [15], and so on. The advantage of content analysis is that the findings are objective and not influenced by the subjective attitude of the researcher, but the disadvantage is that this method can only analyze the explicit communication content, and the intrinsic validity is not high; the advantage of LDA thematic analysis is that it has a clearer purpose and can better reflect the differences between samples, but the disadvantage is that this method is not suitable for short text analysis, and the model effect is not good.…”
Section: Review Of the Current Status Of Domestic And International Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%