2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 capture by aqueous amines and aqueous ammonia–A Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the K G a, as obtained here, is in the range of 0.0136-0.3302 1/s, which is comparable with other solvents, such as MEA solvent which is in the range of 0.0342-0.881 1/s [28] and NaOH/BaCl 2 /H 2 O, which is in the ranges of 0.0651-0.3396 1/s [5] and 0.015-0.14 1/s for a stirred-tank scrubber using an aqueous ammonia solution as the scrubbing solution [4]. On the other hand, from data reported in literatures [8,13,26,27], the K G a can be recalculated for comparison. The recalculated values of wetted-wall column tests are 0.03469-0.2658 1/s [13] and 0.02551-0.4336 1/s [26], respectively; while the recalculated values for packed column are in the range of 0.486-2.43 1/s [8] when a specific area of packings, 500 m 2 /m 3 , is available.…”
Section: Effect Of Process Variables On the R A And K G Amentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the K G a, as obtained here, is in the range of 0.0136-0.3302 1/s, which is comparable with other solvents, such as MEA solvent which is in the range of 0.0342-0.881 1/s [28] and NaOH/BaCl 2 /H 2 O, which is in the ranges of 0.0651-0.3396 1/s [5] and 0.015-0.14 1/s for a stirred-tank scrubber using an aqueous ammonia solution as the scrubbing solution [4]. On the other hand, from data reported in literatures [8,13,26,27], the K G a can be recalculated for comparison. The recalculated values of wetted-wall column tests are 0.03469-0.2658 1/s [13] and 0.02551-0.4336 1/s [26], respectively; while the recalculated values for packed column are in the range of 0.486-2.43 1/s [8] when a specific area of packings, 500 m 2 /m 3 , is available.…”
Section: Effect Of Process Variables On the R A And K G Amentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the case of using MEA as the absorbent, the absorbed carbon dioxide is stored in the liquid phase in a liquid state, which might be released again due to the influence of the pH value and the huge volume. Therefore, in some studies, MEA is changed to aqueous ammonia as the absorbent, which is used to absorb the carbon dioxide as reported in the literature [1,3,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is expected that a considerable amount of additional energy is required to produce chilled water. Dave et al (2009) simulated the aqueous ammonia based process by keeping the flue gas and lean solvent temperatures to the absorber at 10°C and solvent concentration at 2.5 and 5 wt%. Effect of temperature on the CO 2 absorption rate and NH 3 loss rate in absorber 1 under similar conditions.…”
Section: Ammonia Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the commercially available PCC technology is mainly based on alkanol/alkyl amine solutions. A study by Dave et al (2009) shows that retrofitting a MEA based PCC plant to the existing/new mechanical draft water cooled black coal fired plants will reduce the power plant efficiency by 10 absolute percentage points and involves significant capital investment costs. Moreover, there is some concern about the formation of carcinogenic nitrosamines from the use of amines in PCC and their possible spread into the environment (MacDowell et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%