2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 capture using three-dimensionally ordered micromesoporous carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 14 groups the papers according to how the results were presented. Strikingly, there are seven papers that report kinetic data without showing the actual experimental signal nor the uptake curves [5,23,48,156,170,179,184]. The majority of volumetric experiments (85%) report the data converted into dimensionless uptake curves, while for gravimetric experiments there is a broader mix of raw signals and uptake curves.…”
Section: Overview Of Common Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 14 groups the papers according to how the results were presented. Strikingly, there are seven papers that report kinetic data without showing the actual experimental signal nor the uptake curves [5,23,48,156,170,179,184]. The majority of volumetric experiments (85%) report the data converted into dimensionless uptake curves, while for gravimetric experiments there is a broader mix of raw signals and uptake curves.…”
Section: Overview Of Common Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that employed carbon was successful in capturing the mercury and obtained kinetic and thermodynamic parameters were crucial for designing a full-scale unit. Vorokhta et al [17] compared the CO 2 capture by three-dimensionally ordered micromesoporous carbon with carbon materials, carbon nanotubes, carbon nanohorns, and activated carbon. The capture performance of the proposed carbon was shown to be successful with high thermal stability and lower energy demand.…”
Section: Adsorption Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Langmuir isotherm model assumes the energetically homogeneous adsorbent surface, and there is no interaction between the adsorbed molecules, which is suitable for describing monolayer adsorption. 46 The Freundlich isotherm model assumes that the surface coverage of adsorbent is negatively correlated with the adsorption energy, leading to the description of heterogeneous adsorption. 47 The Temkin isotherm model shows the faction related to the adsorbent–adsorbate interaction, which assumes the adsorption heat of adsorbed molecules in the layer reduced linearly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%