2021
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01508-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 emissions of nuclear power and renewable energies: a statistical analysis of European and global data

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the CO2 emissions caused by nuclear and renewable power generation. The knowledge of the share of coal, gas and oil in electricity generation permits the exact calculation of the related CO2 emissions. In addition, there is a second approach especially within the economic sciences, which applies statistical techniques for the study of the energy-related emissions. The background for these studies is the provision of general political advice and the expectation that political, cult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nuclear energy transition (NET it ) reduces emissions in UMI, HI, and the full panel. The empirical literature has also corroborated that NEC reduced emissions in the panel of nuclear-producing countries ( Iwata, Okada & Samreth, 2012 ; Alam, 2013 ; Lau et al, 2019 ; Saidi & Omri, 2020 ; Hassan et al, 2020 ; Azam et al, 2021 ; Kim, 2021 ; Baek & Pride, 2014 ; Vo et al, 2020 ; Wagner, 2021 ; Apergis et al, 2010 ). In a comparison, NET it has a greater magnitude of effect in HI countries compared to UMI countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nuclear energy transition (NET it ) reduces emissions in UMI, HI, and the full panel. The empirical literature has also corroborated that NEC reduced emissions in the panel of nuclear-producing countries ( Iwata, Okada & Samreth, 2012 ; Alam, 2013 ; Lau et al, 2019 ; Saidi & Omri, 2020 ; Hassan et al, 2020 ; Azam et al, 2021 ; Kim, 2021 ; Baek & Pride, 2014 ; Vo et al, 2020 ; Wagner, 2021 ; Apergis et al, 2010 ). In a comparison, NET it has a greater magnitude of effect in HI countries compared to UMI countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Another stream of literature has tested the NEC and pollutant emissions nexus in the panel of nuclear electricity-producing countries. NEC helped in reducing emissions in 25 countries ( Alam, 2013 ), 18 OECD countries ( Lau et al, 2019 ), 15 OECD countries ( Saidi & Omri, 2020 ), 20 OECD countries ( Richmond & Kaufman, 2006 ), 11 OECD countries ( Iwata, Okada & Samreth, 2012 ), G-7 ( Nathaniel et al, 2021 ), 12 countries ( Baek, 2015 ), in BRICS ( Hassan et al, 2020 ), 10 highest emitting countries ( Azam et al, 2021 ), 16 countries ( Kim, 2021 ), 10 countries ( Baek & Pride, 2014 ), 18 countries contributing 95% nuclear reactors globally ( Lee, Kim & Lee, 2017 ), nine countries ( Vo et al, 2020 ), Europe and the globe ( Wagner, 2021 ), and 19 countries ( Apergis et al, 2010 ). On the other hand, some studies could not validate the effect of NEC on pollution emissions in the panel analyses ( Saidi & Ben Mbarek, 2016 ; Al-mulali, 2014 ; Sovacool et al, 2020 ; Jin & Kim, 2018 ; Pao & Chen, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Wagner [13] has recently obtained results in direct contradiction to the conclusions drawn by Sovacool et al This paper provides supplementary criticism for the validity of the conclusions of [11] and concludes that "both, nuclear and renewable power allow a reduction of national CO 2 emission levels. [.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As previously noted, Sovacool et al's paper [11] has been discussed by different authors [12,13]. Let us briefly state some of the main arguments these authors have made regarding this matter.…”
Section: Other Elements Previously Highlighted By Other Authorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation