Summary
Solvent huff ’n’ puff (HnP) is becoming a common enhanced oil recovery (EOR) practice in unconventional tight and ultratight reservoirs. For an effective HnP operation, achieving miscibility is essential for promoting solvent transport into the reservoir matrix and subsequent oil production. This is typically achieved by either increasing the injection pressure or enriching the solvent. However, injection pressure is constrained by compressor capacity, formation fracture pressure, and lateral/vertical containment. In this study, we experimentally assess the feasibility of using natural gas liquid (NGL) for HnP in an ultratight Eagle Ford (EF) shale sample, providing insights into extreme solvent enrichment scenarios in an HnP process. We hypothesize that NGL extracts oil from an oil-saturated shale core through a counterdiffusion process, primarily governed by first-contact miscibility (FCM) between NGL and oil. In this study, we explore the impact of solvent injection on the phase envelope of both dead oil and live oil during the HnP process. We present a critical comparison between C1 HnP, representing the lower limit of solvent enrichment, and NGL HnP, representing the upper limit, focusing on their respective oil recovery mechanisms and in-situ solvent-oil interactions. Using a high-pressure and high-temperature (HPHT) visualization apparatus, we investigate the interactions between NGL and oil, as well as their compositional variations, under bulk-phase conditions and in the core during the HnP process. We propose an analytical theory for the transport of NGL and oil into and out of an ultratight porous medium, explaining the experimental oil recoveries observed from the shale core. NGL and oil transport is modeled under a diffusion-dominated scenario, with FCM playing a crucial role in enhancing diffusion. Compositional analysis indicates that, contrary to C1, NGL extracts heavier oil components during the soaking stage. Core visualization demonstrates a gradual color change of NGL from clear to amber during soaking, indicating oil production via counterdiffusion. NGL expands the two-phase envelope of the dead oil, making it more volatile, while suppressing the phase envelope of the live oil. This potentially extends the duration of single-phase oil flow during the depletion stage in a live-oil system and enhances the oil production through diffusion. NGL achieves significantly lower FCM pressure (FCMP) with oil compared with C1, C1/C2 (70/30), C2, and separator gas, explaining its higher diffusion into the oil-saturated core. The analytical model demonstrates that NGL diffuses to the end of the core by the end of soaking. NGL recovers significantly more oil than C1 in the HnP process. Most of the oil is produced during soaking due to counterdiffusion, with solution-gas drive contributing additional recovery at later stages of depletion, though not as markedly as in C1 HnP.
