“…In the past decade, there has been a surge of interest in MOFs within the realms of CO 2 adsorption, gas separation, and catalysis owing to their remarkable attributes such as a large surface area, tunable porosity, strong metal binding sites, and the capacity for tailored metal–support interactions . In the field of CO 2 hydrogenation, MOFs have emerged as pivotal supports or sacrificial precursors, playing a promising role in the fabrication of efficient catalysts. − MOF-based catalysts may be specifically designed to ensure the uniform dispersion of metal nanoparticles (NPs) and augment the interplay between NPs and the support, effectively preventing the undesired phenomena of sintering and aggregation of active metal species. , In particular, a number of Ni-containing MOF catalysts have been reported in the past decade for CO 2 methanation, exploiting the high dispersion of small-size Ni NPs, including Ni@MOF-5, Ni@MIL-101-Cr, , and Ni@UiO-66. , Moreover, MOF-derived Ni-containing systems have been also reported as sacrificial precursors for the synthesis of efficient catalytic materials, via high temperature (>500 °C) pyrolysis. − Overall, these studies shed light on key features that determine the performances of these Ni-based catalysts, such as the impact of the metal immobilization methods, the nickel reduction conditions, or the Ni loading, in addition to the catalytic conditions themselves (temperature, reactants ratio,...). In parallel, the catalytic activities are also known to be strongly dependent on the support used (SiO 2 , CeO 2 , TiO 2 , ZrO 2, or MgO) .…”