2019
DOI: 10.3390/mi10100678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2 Laser Fabrication of PMMA Microfluidic Double T-Junction Device with Modified Inlet-Angle for Cost-Effective PCR Application

Abstract: The formation of uniform droplets and the control of their size, shape and monodispersity are of utmost importance in droplet-based microfluidic systems. The size of the droplets is precisely tuned by the channel geometry, the surface interfacial tension, the shear force and fluid velocity. In addition, the fabrication technique and selection of materials are essential to reduce the fabrication cost and time. In this paper, for reducing the fabrication cost Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) sheet is used with dir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But this wouldn't affect the result significantly and would not make the results unreliable. The droplet break-up mechanism in 2D simulations resemble with that of 3D simulation (Leshansky and Pismen 2009) and in relevance to this, many studies in the past (Liu and Zhang 2009; Amaya-Bower and Lee 2011) and recently (Wojnicki et al 2018;Nasser et al 2019) have validated their 2D simulations with an experiment. The results are in good agreement.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…But this wouldn't affect the result significantly and would not make the results unreliable. The droplet break-up mechanism in 2D simulations resemble with that of 3D simulation (Leshansky and Pismen 2009) and in relevance to this, many studies in the past (Liu and Zhang 2009; Amaya-Bower and Lee 2011) and recently (Wojnicki et al 2018;Nasser et al 2019) have validated their 2D simulations with an experiment. The results are in good agreement.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The fabrication of multilayer microfluidic devices has used conventional photolithography [ 15 ] as well as alternative methods, such as micro-milling [ 11 , 13 , 16 , 17 ] and resin 3-dimensional (3D) printing [ 14 ]. However, direct laser fabrication methods, although widely used for microfluidic fabrication owing to their cost-effectiveness and ease of operation [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], have not been extensively explored for use in multilayer microfluidic fabrication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, wax-printing is one of the cheapest fabricating methods that can print ~50 µm features 25 while on the other side of the spectrum, EBL can print features as small as 10 nm but costs ~100,000-1,000,000 USD 26 . Most of the one step direct device or mold fabrication methods are based on mechanical micromachining or laser ablation which result in inferior feature size and significant roughness both in the side wall and the substrate as well as reduced opacity 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%