2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CO2-selective polymeric membranes containing amines in crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
194
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
194
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the overall process flow diagram. Since there has been less research into CO 2 -selective polymeric membranes than H 2 -selective polymeric membranes, we chose an optimistic value of CO 2 /H 2 selectivity of 50, which is greater than typical values for CO 2 /H 2 selectivity measured so far [16,[33][34][35][36], most of which are on the order of 10. In addition, we assumed that the selectivity of CO 2 to all other species was 50.…”
Section: Co 2 -Selective Membrane Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows the overall process flow diagram. Since there has been less research into CO 2 -selective polymeric membranes than H 2 -selective polymeric membranes, we chose an optimistic value of CO 2 /H 2 selectivity of 50, which is greater than typical values for CO 2 /H 2 selectivity measured so far [16,[33][34][35][36], most of which are on the order of 10. In addition, we assumed that the selectivity of CO 2 to all other species was 50.…”
Section: Co 2 -Selective Membrane Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Introduction of magnesia into alumina-based membranes has been explored to induce the preferential surface diffusion of CO 2 .…”
Section: Energy and Water • Carbon Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure increase could cause significant decrease of permeability and selectivity [18] and significant power loss (for example, as much as 20% of the power plant output for 5 bar compression) due to the dilute concentration of CO 2 in the flue gas [7]. In comparison, under lab vacuum permeate conditions, a cost of $54/ton CO 2 captured was avoided, which is equivalent to 2/3 capture cost of a pressurized bed [12].…”
Section: Pressure and Vacuummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two staged pressure membrane (with 4 bar pressure at the first stage) was modeled and a cost of $57/ton CO 2 captured was avoided with final CO 2 concentration of 90% [18,19]. Two staged vacuum membrane was simulated to achieve 90% capture efficiency at a cost of $39/ton CO 2 captured [7].…”
Section: Dual/multistage Membranementioning
confidence: 99%