2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co9S8 nanoparticles-embedded porous carbon: A highly efficient sorbent for mercury capture from nonferrous smelting flue gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equilibrium adsorption capacity of CuFeSe 2 through the pseudo-first-order simulation was 526.7 mg·g –1 , exceeding the saturated adsorption capacity of various materials (shown in Figure d). ,, In addition, for the application of sorbents for Hg 0 capture from coal combustion flue gas, the adsorption rate plays a critical role in evaluating the applicability, and the initial Hg 0 adsorption rate of CuFeSe 2 reached up to 900.71 μg·g –1 ·min –1 . As shown in Figure d, the magnitude of the Hg 0 adsorption rate of CuFeSe 2 was higher than those of benchmark mercury sorbents with relatively decent Hg 0 uptake rates. ,, It should be noted that by adjusting the chemical properties of selenide ligands, although the adsorption capacity of CuFeSe 2 was enhanced by several folds, the magnitude of the adsorption rate of CuFeSe 2 was profoundly boosted. The extraordinary kinetics warrant the exhaustion of adsorption capacity within a short-time contact, hence significantly extending the applicability of CuFeSe 2 under an injection scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The equilibrium adsorption capacity of CuFeSe 2 through the pseudo-first-order simulation was 526.7 mg·g –1 , exceeding the saturated adsorption capacity of various materials (shown in Figure d). ,, In addition, for the application of sorbents for Hg 0 capture from coal combustion flue gas, the adsorption rate plays a critical role in evaluating the applicability, and the initial Hg 0 adsorption rate of CuFeSe 2 reached up to 900.71 μg·g –1 ·min –1 . As shown in Figure d, the magnitude of the Hg 0 adsorption rate of CuFeSe 2 was higher than those of benchmark mercury sorbents with relatively decent Hg 0 uptake rates. ,, It should be noted that by adjusting the chemical properties of selenide ligands, although the adsorption capacity of CuFeSe 2 was enhanced by several folds, the magnitude of the adsorption rate of CuFeSe 2 was profoundly boosted. The extraordinary kinetics warrant the exhaustion of adsorption capacity within a short-time contact, hence significantly extending the applicability of CuFeSe 2 under an injection scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The pseudo-second-order kinetic model was described as where q t and q e are the mercury capture at time t (min) and at equilibrium, respectively. k 1 (min –1 ) and k 2 (g·mg –1 ·min –1 ) represent the rate constants of the two kinetic models, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coal combustion is one of the largest industrial sources of mercury emission. The mercury emitted from typical coal-combustion flue gas generally existed in three forms, i.e., elemental mercury (Hg 0 ), oxidized mercury (Hg 2+ ), and particulate bound mercury (Hg p ) [4][5][6][7][8]. The Hg p can be captured by using particulate matter control devices, while the Hg 2+ can be removed by using wet flue-gas scrubbers due to Hg 2+ 's water solubility [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%