Coach Turnover in Top Professional Brazilian Football Championship: A Multilevel Survival Analysis

Abstract

In this study, we examined the probability of coaches’ survival in the top Brazilian professional football championship considering variation across the competitive seasons between 2012 and 2017, considering a multilevel framework. We also considered whether previous coaching experience in the top Brazilian professional football championship would change the probability of coaches’ survival across the season. The data considered 4,560 games from the top professional Brazilian football league (Campeonato Brasileiro Série A) between the 2012 and 2017 seasons. At the start of each season, the coach from each team was followed, being recorded at the time the event occurred, i.e., the coach being sacked. A total survival of 120 coaches was considered between the seasons of 2012 and 2017, i.e., 20 coaches at the beginning of each season. Coaches were assigned as novice (no previous experience as head coach in the top Brazilian championship) or experienced (with at least some previous experience as head coach in the top Brazilian championship). Data were available and extracted from the official website of the Brazilian Football Confederation 1 . On average and considering un-pooled observations, the median life of a coach was about 16.5 rounds. Considering variation between 2012 and 2017 seasons, only about 26.3% (95% CI: 18.2–36.1) of the coaches ended a season without being sacked. By mid-season, at round 19, the probability of coaches’ survival was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.32–0.53). Variation between season on survival estimates per round was substantial (between-season standard deviation = 0.48, 95% credible intervals: 0.25–0.95; corresponding to an inverse logit = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.56–0.72). There was no substantial variation between novice and experienced coaches’ survival probability. The present results expose the vulnerability of the coaching context in Brazilian football, potentially highlighting an excessive emphasis on short-term results to mediate club management decisions.

Contextual Variables Affect Running Performance in Professional Soccer Players: A Brief Report

“…As a recent example, in the 2019 elite Brazilian championship, 24 coach changes occurred throughout the 38 rounds. Coach replacement may result in changes in the game model, work methodology, and athletes' incentive level (Tozetto et al, 2019 ). These factors can directly link to changes in physical performance during matches.…”

Impact of elite soccer coaching change on team performance according to coach- and club-related variables

“…Professional soccer coaches play a key role in leading and managing teams at the individual and club levels [ 1 ]. However, professional coaches are required to deal with several issues that may affect the team’s performance over the season such as player injuries, congested match fixtures, player recruitment, daily practice, media or the unpredictability of environmental-related factors during soccer matches [ 2 ]. At the elite level, the assessment of a coach’s ability in soccer is mainly based on win-loss records within national and international competitions with poor success leading to a coaching change at any stage of the season (e.g.…”

Deporte y regulación: nuevos escenarios y desafíos. Actas del XI Congreso Iberoamericano de Economía del Deporte

“…Or, what are the factors that affect the longevity of the mandate of a coach? The only article concerned with football coaches' survival time that we are aware of is focused on the case of Brazilian league and found evidence that the experience is quite insignificant in this respect, as the expectations are on shortterm results, the leagues suffering thus from a high turnover (and implying that country specificities ought to be controlled for) (Tozetto et al 2019). Two studies focused on NFL brought proof of the fact that being a non-white increases the coaches mandate, while controlling for other performance metrics (Salaga and Juravich 2020) and that having insubordinate and deviant players will increase the coach's likelihood of being sacked (Foreman, Soebbing, and Seifried 2019).…”