2006
DOI: 10.1080/13674580600841901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coaching as an in‐school leadership development strategy: experiences from Leading from the Middle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of appointment, Rhodes and Beneicke argue for the importance of selecting mentors who possess 'personal and professional qualities of the highest order' (2002, p. 304), while Simkins et al (2006) argue that the appointment of a coach with positional authority could in some ways be seen to limit or threaten the coaching process. While these points seem rational, it is important to critically consider the underlying assumption that coaches and mentors must be 'appointed'.…”
Section: School Improvement Through Professional Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of appointment, Rhodes and Beneicke argue for the importance of selecting mentors who possess 'personal and professional qualities of the highest order' (2002, p. 304), while Simkins et al (2006) argue that the appointment of a coach with positional authority could in some ways be seen to limit or threaten the coaching process. While these points seem rational, it is important to critically consider the underlying assumption that coaches and mentors must be 'appointed'.…”
Section: School Improvement Through Professional Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was most obviously exemplified by the different ways in which programme coaching roles were interpreted and the effectiveness with which they were carried out, differences that typically reflected deeper issues around school priorities and school culture (Simkins et al 2006, Simkins 2009 outcomes and moderating factors -quite robust, we had to recast these in relation to differences in detail between the various programmes we evaluated. Where programmes comprised different kinds of interventions as sub-components these needed to be modelled separately; and where the programme was overly complex in terms of the relationship between interventions and participants it had to be abandoned.…”
Section: Insert Fig 1 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, some leaders may not recognise the value of coaching -or indeed other development interventions -until some time after the learning has been completed. Nevertheless, a number of factors seem to underlie variations in coaching quality as perceived at the point of interview, including differences in coaches' motivation, in their perceptions of the role and -despite the training provided by the programmes -in skills (Simkins et al 2006). These variables in turn are likely to reflect the interactions between coaches' dispositions, experience, and the opportunities and constraints offered by the school's structure and culture.…”
Section: Work-based Learning In Lftm and Lpmentioning
confidence: 87%