2013
DOI: 10.1542/neo.14-6-e284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coagulase Negative Staphylococci in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Are We Any Smarter?

Abstract: and Hageman have disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article. This commentary does contain a discussion of an unapproved/ investigative use of a commercial product/ device. Educational Gaps 1. Distinction between definitions and subsequent management of true coagulase negative staphylococcus infections versus contamination or colonization needs to be established. 2. Evidence of the potential clinical impact (ie, neurodevelopmental outcome) of coagulase negative staphylococcus infections in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed that the prevalence of Gram-positive organisms in NICU was high (1.67% of total isolates, 48% of NICU isolates, n = 756) that could be attributed to the high frequency of prematurity and very low birth weight in the neonatal population which is the most important host risk factors for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) infection. The greater number of skin breaks for catheter insertion was also considered as a significant predictor of CoNS sepsis as well as total parenteral nutrition (TPN) use with or without a central venous catheter has been demonstrated to be a risk factor [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also observed that the prevalence of Gram-positive organisms in NICU was high (1.67% of total isolates, 48% of NICU isolates, n = 756) that could be attributed to the high frequency of prematurity and very low birth weight in the neonatal population which is the most important host risk factors for coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) infection. The greater number of skin breaks for catheter insertion was also considered as a significant predictor of CoNS sepsis as well as total parenteral nutrition (TPN) use with or without a central venous catheter has been demonstrated to be a risk factor [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 In spite of microbiological advances, there are no consensus on definitions and practices with CoNS infection among the clinicians thus resulting in over presentation of CoNS as true pathogen. 3 Further multicentric large sample size, case control studies are needed to develop clinical predictability scoring to identify CoNS true infection so that it can be treated wisely and cost effectively which can reduce the exciting dilemma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coagulase negative Staphylococcus aureus (CoNS) is one of the important organisms encountered during evaluation of clinical sepsis in a neonate. 3 On one hand, there is increased survival of low birth weight (LBW) and preterm babies needing invasive procedures which predisposes to CoNS infections; on the other hand vague clinical symptoms of this low virulent organisms with difficulties to differentiate contaminants from true bacteremia in blood culture, coupled with no clear laboratory confirmative evidence of sepsis makes the clinician less confident to withhold reserve antibiotics like vancomycin from sick babies at NICU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) The finding that coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CONS) was the commonest organism in both early-and late-onset sepsis should be viewed with caution in light of the great controversy about the criteria for defining CONS sepsis in newborns (6). These criteria have often resulted in CONS being overrepresented as a true pathogen in neonatal sepsis (7).…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%