1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09682.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coagulation screening before epidural analgesia in pre‐eclampsia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Similarly, an audit of 176 coagulation screens performed by Trotter et al reported that no preeclamptic patients with PLT >150 Â 10 9 /L were found to have abnormal coagulation. 8 However, no specific details were provided in either study detailing the timing of laboratory testing prior to NB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6 Similarly, an audit of 176 coagulation screens performed by Trotter et al reported that no preeclamptic patients with PLT >150 Â 10 9 /L were found to have abnormal coagulation. 8 However, no specific details were provided in either study detailing the timing of laboratory testing prior to NB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are similar to those of Barker et al and Trotter et al who reviewed predelivery PLT and laboratory coagulation tests in patients with preeclampsia. 6,8 In the cohort of Barker of over 400 patients with preeclampsia who underwent coagulation testing prior to delivery, 90% had a PLT >100 × 10 9 /L and coagulation indices within a predefined normal range; PLT <100 × 10 9 /L occurred in 9% of all cases, all of whom were diagnosed with severe preeclampsia. 6 Similarly, an audit of 176 coagulation screens performed by Trotter et al reported that no preeclamptic patients with PLT >150 × 10 9 /L were found to have abnormal coagulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations