2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(02)00245-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coal blend combustion: link between unburnt carbon in fly ashes and maceral composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total carbon is taken into consideration in the evaluation of LOI and, therefore, it might include inorganic carbon sources as well, such as carbonates. Since all the studied coals have a high percentage of ash, the unburned carbon in fly ash cannot be used to make comparisons among the combustion performances of these coals [21]. Thus, for comparative purposes, the unburned carbon can be used as an indicator of burnout performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total carbon is taken into consideration in the evaluation of LOI and, therefore, it might include inorganic carbon sources as well, such as carbonates. Since all the studied coals have a high percentage of ash, the unburned carbon in fly ash cannot be used to make comparisons among the combustion performances of these coals [21]. Thus, for comparative purposes, the unburned carbon can be used as an indicator of burnout performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-coal rank [31][32][33] -maceral composition of coal [8,17,18,31,[34][35][36][37][38][39] -volatile matter content [26,40] -moisture content in coal [10,41] -particle-size effect [9,10,16,26,[42][43][44] -coal char properties (porosity, fragmentation, specific surface area, etc.) [8,26,45] -effect of coal mineral matter [8,16,26,46] -coal blending [32,39,44,[47][48][49] -co-combustion of coal with alternative fuels [50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Effect Of Coal Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also evident that under atmospheric conditions that the bubble rupture and pore structure is much larger than under 30bar pressure. The predictive caking model developed under 30bar pressure included 3 parameters, the maceral index [12], volatile matter divided by inherent moisture (pore resistance number), and the carbon content. This model has an R 2 value of 87%, which is an acceptable model considering that 87% of the experimental data is incorporated into the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%