2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coal dust particle size survey of US mines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This combustible material can be feedstock for coal dust explosions, and current mining operations produce finer and more easily combustible particles than was the case in the early twentieth century [1]. Limestone powder, known as rock dust, is used widely as an inerting agent, and mine safety regulations specify minimal total incombustible content (TIC) for both intake and return airways.…”
Section: Abstract-float Dust Wireless Sensor Network Total Incombumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combustible material can be feedstock for coal dust explosions, and current mining operations produce finer and more easily combustible particles than was the case in the early twentieth century [1]. Limestone powder, known as rock dust, is used widely as an inerting agent, and mine safety regulations specify minimal total incombustible content (TIC) for both intake and return airways.…”
Section: Abstract-float Dust Wireless Sensor Network Total Incombumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15–17] The mass median diameter of deposited coal dust in mine return entries was 122–172 μm, and the mass fraction ≤ 74 μm was 27–38% for 50 bituminous U.S. coal mines. [16] The mass of airborne coal dust ≤ 74 μm in mine ventilation returns is also confounded by the presence of rock dust and requires greater measurement selectivity than deposition samples due to the lower mass concentrations of airborne coal dust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Harris et al [20] compared LTA methods that preserved limestone while combusting coal but differed by thermal treatment times. Rock and coal dust mixtures were heated at 515°C for 2.5 hr by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) National Air and Dust Laboratory (NADL) at Mt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methane explosion and coal-dust explosion have been studied separately by several researchers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Paul et al [11] discussed various ways in which the dust explosion hazard can be mitigated to complement the relatively well-established suite of engineering and procedural dust explosion risk-reduction measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%