2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coal mining on pastureland in Southern Chile; challenging recognition and participation as guarantees for environmental justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even when I went down the line of planning, it was still not believed and ridiculed" (COU002). While individuals, themselves, were allowed to provide input about their concerns, the process of public participation was nevertheless characterized by a lack of recognition of values and lifestyles of those opposing the development (Bustos et al 2017). Individuals' ideas of how farming should be organized in the area and what environment they would like to live in were not recognized by decision-makers (George and Reed 2017).…”
Section: Procedural Environmental Injustice and Farming Intensificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even when I went down the line of planning, it was still not believed and ridiculed" (COU002). While individuals, themselves, were allowed to provide input about their concerns, the process of public participation was nevertheless characterized by a lack of recognition of values and lifestyles of those opposing the development (Bustos et al 2017). Individuals' ideas of how farming should be organized in the area and what environment they would like to live in were not recognized by decision-makers (George and Reed 2017).…”
Section: Procedural Environmental Injustice and Farming Intensificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, local residents were heard, but did not possess the power to guarantee that the decision-makers would heed their input (Arnstein 1969). They were unable to influence farm construction decisions through official channels, which resulted in their disempowerment in the decision-making process (Bustos et al 2017).…”
Section: Procedural Environmental Injustice and Farming Intensificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the development of and increasing interest in sustainable development (SD), the number of publications devoted to the environmental and social aspects of mining has increased [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Research on the SD of the mining industry focuses on reclamation costs [31][32][33][34][35], the balance of expenditures, the level of local communities' satisfaction with the mining enterprise and the public image of the mining enterprises [36,37].…”
Section: Literature Studies On Costs In Coal Mining In the Context Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an extensive and interdisciplinary body of scholarly work that utilizes qualitative and quantitative social research methods to analyze mining activities and conflicts from spatial, socio-economic and ecological distribution perspectives [ 10 13 ]. The environmental justice (EJ) and political ecology literatures, for instance, abound with studies that employ the case study approach to uncover and shed light on the central concerns and claims of the social actors involved in mining resistance struggles [ 14 21 ]. Accordingly, civil society organizations (CSOs) active in mining conflicts focus on two issues in particular: on the link between distributional concerns (the need for environmental health and security) and claims for recognition (the defense of basic human rights and indigenous territorial rights) [ 22 23 ], and on the importance of participation in decision-making, so as to be able to introduce alternative visions of development in decision-making processes (participation) [ 10 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%