2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11053-019-09591-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coal Permeability Evolution Under Different Water-Bearing Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, when previous studies were summarized, it was found that there were two contrary conclusions concerning the influence of water on the slippage effect. One stated that water reduced the effective pore radius, leading to an enhanced slippage effect within micropores, , while the other emphasized that water weakened collisions between gas molecules and the surface wall, leading to a reduced slippage effect. In summary, the distribution of pores in tight coal under the coupling actions of stress and water was variable rather than constant, which, in turn, altered the gas slippage effect. No unified conclusions, however, have been offered on the influence of pore structure parameters on slip effects at present. , Therefore, the echoes between external factors, pore structures, and slippage effect still need investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when previous studies were summarized, it was found that there were two contrary conclusions concerning the influence of water on the slippage effect. One stated that water reduced the effective pore radius, leading to an enhanced slippage effect within micropores, , while the other emphasized that water weakened collisions between gas molecules and the surface wall, leading to a reduced slippage effect. In summary, the distribution of pores in tight coal under the coupling actions of stress and water was variable rather than constant, which, in turn, altered the gas slippage effect. No unified conclusions, however, have been offered on the influence of pore structure parameters on slip effects at present. , Therefore, the echoes between external factors, pore structures, and slippage effect still need investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas permeability decreased to 0.13 μD when the water saturation reached 91%, and the permeability decline rate was 0.336 μD. The permeability of coal decreased with the increase in water saturation, which was consistent with the results of Li et al 24 3.2. Relative Permeability Measurement Results.…”
Section: Gas Permeability Of Coal Under Different Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when modeling permeability, the impact of various influential factors is considered on the fracture permeability in coal; for example, classic P&M and S&D models have established fracture permeability models under conditions of uniaxial strain. , Tang et al based on S&D models considered the influence of fracture compressibility by establishing a permeability model of variable fracture under different boundary conditions. When the influence of moisture and gas adsorption on permeability is considered, Li et al established fracture permeability models that consider the excess adsorption in wet coal. However, it was thought unreasonable to ignore the conductivity of matrix pores when the scale of differences between pores and fracture networks in the matrix was small .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 Tang et al 34 based on S&D models considered the influence of fracture compressibility by establishing a permeability model of variable fracture under different boundary conditions. When the influence of moisture and gas adsorption on permeability is considered, Li et al 35 established fracture permeability models that consider the excess adsorption in wet coal. However, it was thought unreasonable to ignore the conductivity of matrix pores when the scale of differences between pores and fracture networks in the matrix was small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%