1996
DOI: 10.1144/gsl.sp.1996.109.01.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coal thickness distributions on the UK continental shelf

Abstract: A review of the coals on the UK continental shelf as conventional dry gas source rocks and coalbed methane reservoirs has been undertaken using wireline log data from 1747 oil/gas wells. Coals ranging from Late Devonian to Pleistocene age were recorded, with important coal-bearing sequences in the Lower and Upper Carboniferous, Middle Jurassic and Palaeogene. The coals range from lignite to anthracite rank. Coal thicknesses were interpreted from a combination of gamma, sonic and density wireline logs. However,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, most mature coals are able to produce both. The results clearly demonstrate (Knight et al, 1996) that in UK, for example, most coal beds are thinner than 1 m with high proportion ( F 60%) thinner than 50 cm (exponential distribution, Fig. 9).…”
Section: Modern Approach (Cbm Research)mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, most mature coals are able to produce both. The results clearly demonstrate (Knight et al, 1996) that in UK, for example, most coal beds are thinner than 1 m with high proportion ( F 60%) thinner than 50 cm (exponential distribution, Fig. 9).…”
Section: Modern Approach (Cbm Research)mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…UK Westphalian onshore coal seams frequency distribution. Note that 60% are < 50 cm (after Knight et al, 1996). (Table 15) (1) What should be the modern definition for reserves and resources, and the corresponding appropriate vocabulary?…”
Section: Depth (Fig 10)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that when the thickness of the coal seam is less than 0.5 m, the logging response might include the contribution of the upper and lower surrounding rocks of the thin coal seam, blurring the boundary between the coal seam logging anomaly and the lithology of the upper and lower surrounding rocks. Therefore, logging's ability to identify thin coal seams is limited [20,21].…”
Section: Geophysical Response Characteristics Of Coal Seamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that when the thickness of the coal seam is less than 0.5 m, the logging response might include the contribution of the upper and lower surrounding rocks of the thin coal seam, blurring the boundary between the coal seam logging anomaly and the lithology of the upper and lower surrounding rocks. Therefore, logging's ability to identify thin coal seams is limited [20,21]. According to the above identification threshold of logs with different lithologies, the thicknesses of various lithologies in different layers of the study area can be calculated by Eexplorer software.…”
Section: Geophysical Response Characteristics Of Coal Seamsmentioning
confidence: 99%