2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41114-021-00033-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalescence of black hole–neutron star binaries

Abstract: We review the current status of general relativistic studies for coalescences of black hole–neutron star binaries. First, high-precision computations of black hole–neutron star binaries in quasiequilibrium circular orbits are summarized, focusing on the quasiequilibrium sequences and the mass-shedding limit. Next, the current status of numerical-relativity simulations for the merger of black hole–neutron star binaries is described. We summarize our understanding for the merger process, tidal disruption and its… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 639 publications
(1,101 reference statements)
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For GW170817, they calculate that both mechanisms have efficiencies that are consistent with GRB170817, and they can therefore not distinguish between the two. Kyutoku et al (2021) argue that neutrino pair annihilation does not occur on a sufficiently long timescale to explain the observed sGRB duration. Here we thus assumed that a jet gets launched through the BZ mechanism and followed SG21 for the accretion-to-jet energy conversion efficiency (see Barbieri et al 2019 for a similar derivation).…”
Section: Grb Jetmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For GW170817, they calculate that both mechanisms have efficiencies that are consistent with GRB170817, and they can therefore not distinguish between the two. Kyutoku et al (2021) argue that neutrino pair annihilation does not occur on a sufficiently long timescale to explain the observed sGRB duration. Here we thus assumed that a jet gets launched through the BZ mechanism and followed SG21 for the accretion-to-jet energy conversion efficiency (see Barbieri et al 2019 for a similar derivation).…”
Section: Grb Jetmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A (semi-)analytical description derived from the mapping of the output of many such simulations to a variety of associated input source parameters will be a valuable tool in the inference of a single observed source. It is worth bearing in mind that the influence of the central BH engine and surrounding ejecta on the jet propagation and opening angle is still under much debate, certainly in BHNS mergers (Kyutoku et al 2021). Systematics will be a limiting factor when incorporating such descriptions too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dense matter's presence in a merging binary, as a finite size object distorted by the gravitational field of its companion, leads to more gravitational wave emission than for black hole binaries and a faster evolution towards merger [104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111]. The size of a neutron star also determines if and when it can be tidally disrupted by a black hole companion (for black hole-neutron star binaries) and when two neutron stars collide and merge (for neutron star-neutron star binaries) [112][113][114][115]. Finally, the post-merger evolution of a neutron star-neutron star binary is strongly impacted by the properties of dense matter: unknown nuclear physics determines whether the remnant collapses to a black hole, as well as the frequency of post-merger gravitational waves driven by oscillations in the remnant [116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132].…”
Section: Nuclear Physics and Neutron Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…defining the incompressibility K 0 ≡ 9ρ 2 0 d 2 E 0 (ρ)/dρ 2 | ρ=ρ 0 and skewness J 0 ≡ 27ρ 3 0 d 3 E 0 (ρ)/dρ 3 | ρ=ρ 0 of the SNM, the slope coefficient L ≡ 3ρ 0 dE sym (ρ)/dρ| ρ=ρ 0 , the curvature coefficient K sym ≡ 9ρ 2 0 d 2 E sym (ρ)/dρ 2 | ρ=ρ 0 and the skewness coefficient J sym ≡ 27ρ 3 0 d 3 E sym (ρ)/dρ 3 | ρ=ρ 0 of the symmetry energy, etc. The EOS of ANM provides an important and basic input for various applications in both nuclear physics and astrophysics [60,80,81,78,82,83,84,85,86].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%