Abstract:Dynamic epistemic logics which model abilities of agents to make various
announcements and influence each other's knowledge have been studied
extensively in recent years. Two notable examples of such logics are Group
Announcement Logic and Coalition Announcement Logic. They allow us to reason
about what groups of agents can achieve through joint announcements in
non-competitive and competitive environments. In this paper, we consider a
combination of these logics -- Coalition and Group Announcement Logic and
p… Show more
“…Ågotnes et al (2010) propose a group announcement modality G ϕ that means "group G can announce certain facts, individually known to members of the group, after which statement ϕ will be true". Galimullin and Alechina (2017) study a modality G ϕ that states "ϕ will become true after an announcement by group G and will remain true after further announcements made by agents outside of group G".…”
Section: Preferences and Public Announcementsmentioning
The article studies preferences of agents in a setting with imperfect information. For such a setting, the authors propose a new class of preferences. It is said that an agent prefers one statement over another if, among all indistinguishable worlds, the agent prefers the worlds where the first statement is true to those where the second one is true. The main technical result is a sound and complete logical system describing the interplay between a binary modality capturing preferences and the knowledge modality. The proof of completeness is using a newly proposed “tumbled pairs” technique.
“…Ågotnes et al (2010) propose a group announcement modality G ϕ that means "group G can announce certain facts, individually known to members of the group, after which statement ϕ will be true". Galimullin and Alechina (2017) study a modality G ϕ that states "ϕ will become true after an announcement by group G and will remain true after further announcements made by agents outside of group G".…”
Section: Preferences and Public Announcementsmentioning
The article studies preferences of agents in a setting with imperfect information. For such a setting, the authors propose a new class of preferences. It is said that an agent prefers one statement over another if, among all indistinguishable worlds, the agent prefers the worlds where the first statement is true to those where the second one is true. The main technical result is a sound and complete logical system describing the interplay between a binary modality capturing preferences and the knowledge modality. The proof of completeness is using a newly proposed “tumbled pairs” technique.
“…It uses modality S C φ that stands for "there is a strategy of coalition C that guarantees φ". His approach has been widely studied by others [4,21,22]. Alur, Henzinger, and Kupferman introduced Alternating-Time Temporal Logic (ATL) that combines temporal and coalition modalities [5].…”
The article proposes a trimodal logical system that can express the strategic ability of coalitions to learn from their experience. The main technical result is the completeness of the proposed system.
“…Pauly proved the completeness of the basic logic of coalition power. His approach has been widely studied in the literature [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].…”
The article compares two different approaches of incorporating probability into coalition logics. One is based on the semantics of games with stochastic transitions and the other on games with the stochastic failures. The work gives an example of a non-trivial property of coalition power for the first approach and a complete axiomatization for the second approach. It turns out that the logical properties of the coalition power modality under the second approach depend on whether the modal language allows the empty coalition. The main technical results for the games with stochastic failures are a strong completeness theorem for the logical system without the empty coalition and an incompleteness theorem which shows that there is no strongly complete logical system in the language with the empty coalition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.