2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-010-9736-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalition incentives for political budget cycles

Abstract: Political budget cycles, Elections, Coalition government, Budget deficits, D72, E62, D82,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the literature that deals with the role of veto players in budgeting (Franzese, 2002a;Tsebelis, 2002;Tsebelis and Chang, 2004) has paid little attention to PBC theory as the main preoccupation remained the detrimental effect of government fragmentation on budget control in the long run. 2 The main thrust of the PBC's literature, on the other hand, only tangentially addressed the conditioning effects of governmental fragmentation with either mixed results (Alt and Rose, 2007;Franzese, 2002b) or without empirical evidence to support the theoretical innovations (Hanusch, 2012). By building a model on veto players' fiscal impact in fragmented governments, I offer a formal conceptualization of PBCs in different governmental settings and then proceed to empirically test the model's implications.…”
Section: Government Fragmentation and Fiscal Profligacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the literature that deals with the role of veto players in budgeting (Franzese, 2002a;Tsebelis, 2002;Tsebelis and Chang, 2004) has paid little attention to PBC theory as the main preoccupation remained the detrimental effect of government fragmentation on budget control in the long run. 2 The main thrust of the PBC's literature, on the other hand, only tangentially addressed the conditioning effects of governmental fragmentation with either mixed results (Alt and Rose, 2007;Franzese, 2002b) or without empirical evidence to support the theoretical innovations (Hanusch, 2012). By building a model on veto players' fiscal impact in fragmented governments, I offer a formal conceptualization of PBCs in different governmental settings and then proceed to empirically test the model's implications.…”
Section: Government Fragmentation and Fiscal Profligacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study differs from Brender and Drazen's work, as we do not analyze whether the Chief Executive benefits from election-motivated fiscal policies. As Hanusch (2012) points out, certainly in the OECD but also in other parts of the world, the government is formed by a coalition of parties. Although it seems safe to assume that each coalition member seeks re-election, some parties may gain more from budget manipulation than others.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to Brender and Drazen (2008), we take into account that many countries have coalition governments (Hanusch 2012). We therefore focus on votes received by political parties participating in the government.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logical next step in this line of research is to analyse how the coalition/multiparty government may use its power for their own benefit, usually known as the political business cycle, such as that proposed by Hanusch(2012). Another potential theoretical development that departs from this paper is modelling the strategic behaviour of the president given uncertainties in the coalition at the parliament such as in the political bargaining literatures (Staahl, 1972;Rubinstein, 1982;Usher, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%