Coalition models: Lessons learned from the CDC’s Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy

Kramer, Jane S.; Philliber, Susan; Brindis, Claire D.; Kamin, Stephanie L.; Chadwick, Amy E.; Revels, Michelle; Chervin, Doryn D.; Driscoll, Anne K.; Bartelli, Debra; Wike, Richard; Peterson, Sara; Schmidt, Cathleen K.; Valderrama, L. Teresa

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.05.010

Cited by 36 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are numerous examples of community mobilization and coalition building which can inform and assist the research-policy interaction [14,[27][28][29][30][31]. In these models collaboration begins with endorsement and this is followed by the provision of support (including but not limited to funds) and participation where members of a coalition may be involved in each others' activities; it ends with joint planning and implementation of activities [32].…”

Section: Framework For Collective Research and Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Engaging policy makers in road safety research in Malaysia: A theoretical and contextual analysis

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Road traffic injuries (RTIs) are a growing public health problem that must be addressed through evidence-based interventions including policy-level changes such as the enactment of legislation to mandate specific behaviors and practices. Policy makers need to be engaged in road safety research to ensure that road safety policies are grounded in scientific evidence. This paper examines the strategies used to engage policy makers and other stakeholder groups and discusses the challenges that result from a multi-disciplinary, inter-sectoral collaboration. A framework for engaging policy makers in research was developed and applied to describe an example of collective road safety research in Malaysia. Key components of this framework include readiness, assessment, planning, implementation/evaluation, and policy development/sustainability. The case study of a collaborative intervention trial for the prevention of motorcycle crashes and deaths in Malaysia serves as a model for policy engagement by road safety and injury researchers. The analytic description of this research process in Malaysia demonstrates that the framework, through its five stages, can be used as a tool to guide the integration of needed research evidence into policy for road safety and injury prevention.

show abstract

Section: Framework For Collective Research and Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Engaging policy makers in road safety research in Malaysia: A theoretical and contextual analysis

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The 13 Communities Project was conducted from 1995 to 2002 and was a demonstration project to see if building and strengthening teen pregnancy prevention coalitions would result in improved community level capacity to plan and implement effective and sustainable teen pregnancy prevention programming (Cassell et al 2005). However, CDC learned from the 13 Communities Project that even though coalitions were important partners in prevention, the model had limited success in actually changing prevention practice at the community level (Chervin et al 2005) and many of the partnerships created in the project were not sustained by the end of the project (Kramer et al 2005). Although the findings of the 13 Communities Project were somewhat discouraging to the many partners who had worked tirelessly to build community level capacity, the project offered valuable lessons about bridging research and practice.…”

Section: History Of Cdc's Efforts To Improve Teen Pregnancy Preventiomentioning

confidence: 99%

Promoting Science‐based Approaches to Teen Pregnancy Prevention: Proactively Engaging the Three Systems of the Interactive Systems Framework

Lesesne

Lewis

White

et al. 2008

American J of Comm Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the field of teen pregnancy prevention many efficacious prevention programs are available but adoption of these programs is slow at the community level. In this article, we present a multi-site, capacity-building effort called the Promoting Science-based Approaches to Teen Pregnancy Prevention project (PSBA) as a case example of a proactive application of the Interactive System Framework (ISF) for dissemination and implementation. The ISF is a multi-system model leading to dissemination and implementation of science-based prevention programming through the work of three interactive systems: The "Prevention Delivery," "Prevention Support," and "Prevention Synthesis & Translation" Systems. This article describes the proactive use of the ISF to conceptualize and bolster the PSBA program's goal of assisting local prevention partners in the use of science-based approaches (SBA) to prevent teen pregnancy. PSBA uses all three systems of the ISF to facilitate practice improvements and offers valuable research opportunities to investigate factors related to dissemination and implementation processes across these systems. Describing our application of this framework highlights the feasibility of actively using the ISF to build prevention infrastructure and to guide large-scale prevention promotion strategies in the area of teen pregnancy prevention. The program's ongoing evaluation is presented as an example of early efforts to develop an evidence base around the ISF. Research implications are discussed.

show abstract

“…Although local health departments could apply for CCPP funds by serving as the "hub" agency, i.e., the institutional home for the coalition, responses to the initial request for proposal were not restricted to health departments, and only four of the 13 funded sites used their local health department as the hub. In fact, research conducted within the CCPP found that although health departments were able to convene community groups, they were more likely than other, usually nongovernmental agencies, to be bureaucratic and hierarchical [8].…”

Section: Experiences With Coalitionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, coalitions comprised primarily of neighborhood members were difficult to maintain [8]. Many coalition members (50%) represented health or youth development service organizations; few members were community residents or youth (13%) [15].…”

Section: Positives and Negativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

So what have we learned? The Editors’ comments on the coalition approach to teen pregnancy

Klerman

Santelli

Klein

2005

Journal of Adolescent Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coalition models: Lessons learned from the CDC’s Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy

Cited by 36 publications

References 18 publications

Engaging policy makers in road safety research in Malaysia: A theoretical and contextual analysis

Engaging policy makers in road safety research in Malaysia: A theoretical and contextual analysis

Promoting Science‐based Approaches to Teen Pregnancy Prevention: Proactively Engaging the Three Systems of the Interactive Systems Framework

So what have we learned? The Editors’ comments on the coalition approach to teen pregnancy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About