1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01026.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coalitions in male sugar gliders: are they natural?

Abstract: The sugar glider Petaurus breviceps is generally considered to be a polygynous, group-nesting species. However, recent captive studies have indicated that dominance hierarchies and shared codominance amongst males formed when males were housed in multiple-male, multiple-female cages with male-biased sex ratios. This study uses data from sugar glider groups in natural populations to assess the probability of male dominance hierarchies and the opportunity for codominant father±son coalitions. Nesting groups of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few documented cases worldwide of long‐term use. The two best cases are from regrowth forest in southern Australia where populations of 20–100 sugar gliders were supported by nest boxes (Wood & Wallis ; Sadler & Ward ; Beyer & Goldingay ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few documented cases worldwide of long‐term use. The two best cases are from regrowth forest in southern Australia where populations of 20–100 sugar gliders were supported by nest boxes (Wood & Wallis ; Sadler & Ward ; Beyer & Goldingay ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous inferences of dispersal in sugar gliders have been based on limited direct observations and video camera data, with somewhat conflicting results. Although both male and female young dispersed from their natal population in eucalypt remnants in an agricultural matrix in southern Victoria (Suckling ), Sadler and Ward () reported that nesting groups of sugar gliders had female‐biased sex ratios and inferred that the dispersing sex was male. Overall, our results are consistent with the species showing female philopatry and male‐biased dispersal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations of social behaviour in captivity may be particularly misleading if group structure differs greatly from that which is the norm in the wild (Sadler & Ward, 1999). However, studies of captive animals may allow the observation of subtle social interactions that are overlooked in field studies because of limited visibility of the subjects, or a lack of continuity of observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%