2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.3114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coarse Grained Simulations of a Small Peptide: Effects of Finite Damping and Hydrodynamic Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All simulations reported here were performed with the CG simulation code uiowa_BD ( 45 , 48 , 49 ). The conformational dynamics of the polymerase were simulated using the Langevin dynamics algorithm developed by Geyer and Winter ( 50 ), a simple extension of the Ermak-McCammon algorithm of Brownian dynamics ( 51 ). The former algorithm has the important advantage that it allows comparatively long time steps to be employed ( 50 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All simulations reported here were performed with the CG simulation code uiowa_BD ( 45 , 48 , 49 ). The conformational dynamics of the polymerase were simulated using the Langevin dynamics algorithm developed by Geyer and Winter ( 50 ), a simple extension of the Ermak-McCammon algorithm of Brownian dynamics ( 51 ). The former algorithm has the important advantage that it allows comparatively long time steps to be employed ( 50 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conformational dynamics of the polymerase were simulated using the Langevin dynamics algorithm developed by Geyer and Winter ( 50 ), a simple extension of the Ermak-McCammon algorithm of Brownian dynamics ( 51 ). The former algorithm has the important advantage that it allows comparatively long time steps to be employed ( 50 ). In all simulations, a time step of 125 fs was used, and a list of pairs of beads engaged in non-bonded interactions was constructed every 100 time steps (every 12.5 ps).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One has a list of the positions and momentums of all of the atoms in the simulation, and the software calculates the forces acting on each of the atoms to determine how they change position and momentum over a very short time step. The key difference between LD and MD simulations, however, is that in LD simulations, the atoms of the protein are randomly nudged during the time step calculations to mimic collisions with solvent atoms [ 40 , 41 ]. As stated above, BD simulations are a simplified, subset of LD simulations in which there is no inertia.…”
Section: Molecular Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%