2010
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2009.2020070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coarse-to-Fine Approach for Urban Area Interpretation Using TerraSAR-X Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies concerning automated land cover/land use classifications of specific datasets in urban areas, or at least in partly built-up areas, can be found in the literature (see, for example, [1][2][3][4][5] for aerial image data, [6][7][8][9] for laser scanner data, [10][11][12][13][14][15] for high-resolution optical satellite images, and [16][17][18][19][20] for high-resolution SAR images). Some details of selected studies are presented in Table 1 (we selected studies that used only remotely sensed data for classification, presented the overall accuracy of the classification, and had classes most similar to our study).…”
Section: Comparison Of New Remotely Sensed Datasets For Land Cover CLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies concerning automated land cover/land use classifications of specific datasets in urban areas, or at least in partly built-up areas, can be found in the literature (see, for example, [1][2][3][4][5] for aerial image data, [6][7][8][9] for laser scanner data, [10][11][12][13][14][15] for high-resolution optical satellite images, and [16][17][18][19][20] for high-resolution SAR images). Some details of selected studies are presented in Table 1 (we selected studies that used only remotely sensed data for classification, presented the overall accuracy of the classification, and had classes most similar to our study).…”
Section: Comparison Of New Remotely Sensed Datasets For Land Cover CLmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marin et al [19] introduced a new approach to building change detection in multitemporal VHR SAR images based on backscattering variability. A semiautomatic segmentation-based tool for urban area interpretation in SAR images was proposed in [20]. Voisin et al [21] presented a new model combining amplitude SAR data and textural information into a Markov random field model to address the problem of classifying images of urban areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare the performance of the algorithm detailed in this paper to those of others, four alternatives were identified. The algorithms used for the comparison were the mean-shift algorithm [42] implemented within the Orfeo toolbox [47], as it is widely cited (e.g., [48][49][50]) as an approach that produced good results on a wide variety of Earth Observation (EO) data, the eCognition multi-resolution segmentation algorithm [28], as the algorithm most commonly used within the literature (e.g., [1,2,51]), and the Quickshift algorithm of Vedaldi and Soatto [52] and the algorithm of Felzenszwalb and Huttenlocher [53], implemented within the scikit-image library and interfaced within the RSGISLib library [54], as examples of more recent approaches from the computer vision community applicable to EO data. A SPOT-5 scene (a subset of which is shown in Figure 10A), which represents a range of land covers and uses, was used for the experiment.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%