Coastal erosion and public archaeology in Brittany, France:

Benlloch, Pau Olmos; Lopez-Romero, Elias; Daire, Marie-Yvane

doi:10.2307/j.ctvh1dp4n.13

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…La metodología fue adaptada de investigaciones en contextos europeos (Daire et al, 2012;Ballesteros-Arias et al, 2013;Olmos Benlloch et al, 2017;Mandon et al, 2022) que también fue aplicada en áreas protegidas de Uruguay (Villarmarzo, 2018). El procedimiento fundamental consiste en evaluar el balance entre factores de riesgo (A) y factores de resistencia (B) (Tabla 1).…”

Section: Evaluación De Vulnerabilidad Y Riesgo De Los Cerritosunclassified

Evaluación de riesgo y vulnerabilidad de montículos indígenas en contextos de producción agropecuaria en la región de India Muerta, Uruguay

Gazzán,

Gianotti,

Cancela Cereijo

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El manejo y modificación del medio ambiente durante miles de años dio como resultado un paisaje fuertemente antropizado en la región este de Uruguay, caracterizado por la presencia de cientos de montículos de gran relevancia arqueológica y ambiental. Este artículo evalúa la vulnerabilidad y los riesgos que enfrentan los montículos de tierra de origen indígena dentro del contexto de producción agrícola en la región de India Muerta Uruguay. Se utiliza una metodología de evaluación de la vulnerabilidad,que pondera los factores de riesgo y resistencia de cada estructura monticular a partir de la confección de un formulario de evaluación de vulnerabilidad, llamado VEF por sus siglas en inglés. Los resultados alcanzados indican que son altamente vulnerables a los impactos de la producción agrícola desarrollada en la región. La expansión de los cultivos intensivos, particularmente de arroz, así como la ganadería bovina, produce un impacto negativo, generando incluso la destrucción de estos elementos del paisaje. La valoración de riesgos y vulnerabilidad implementada en este estudio proporciona indicadores concretos para la evaluación, seguimiento y conservación del patrimonio arqueológico en los paisajes agrícolas, que puede ser integrada a otros indicadores de uso común en la gestión ambiental y la planificación territorial.

show abstract

Section: Evaluación De Vulnerabilidad Y Riesgo De Los Cerritosunclassified

Evaluación de riesgo y vulnerabilidad de montículos indígenas en contextos de producción agropecuaria en la región de India Muerta, Uruguay

Gazzán,

Gianotti,

Cancela Cereijo

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As a result of climate change, impacts to archaeological sites is occurring at the level of the microscopic microbial (Hollesen et al. , 2017: 94) through to the macroscopic terra‐forming (Jensen, 2017: 131; Benlloch et al ., 2017: 81; Dawson et al ., 2017: 23–25; Lopez‐Romero et al. , 2017: 73–74; Palsdottir and Feeley, 2017: 102).…”

Section: Climate Change and Uchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The rate of loss of cultural heritage is currently not quantified in most countries, though early coastal monitoring in Scotland since the mid 1990s (Dawson, 2003), and later in England (Wragg et al ., 2017), Wales (Gerrard, 2017), Ireland (Bonsall and Moore, 2017), Brittany (Benlloch et al. , 2017), Alaska (Jensen, 2017), Iceland (Palsdottir and Feeley, 2017), Greenland (Hollesen et al ., 2017), Australia (Carmichael et al ., 2017) and Cyprus (Andreou et al ., 2016 has demonstrated that our located tangible heritage along the coastline is being lost.…”

Section: Climate Change and Uchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other projects have been developed and delivered by Wessex Archaeology, the Maritime Archaeology Trust (Arch‐Manche project) and the Museum of London Archaeology (Coastal and Intertidal Zone Archaeology Network project). In more recent years, citizen science projects have blossomed globally with thousands of projects happening around the world (Benlloch et al. , 2017; Bonsall and Moore, 2017; Carmichael et al ., 2017; Gerrard, 2017; Hollensen et al ., 2017; Jensen, 2017; Palsdottir and Feeley, 2017; Wragg et al ., 2017; Zooniverse, 2019).…”

Section: Site Monitoring Surveysmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Going for the win‐win: including the public in underwater cultural heritage management through citizen science in Australia and New Zealand

Viduka

2020

International Journal of Nautical Archaeology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

UCH managers are increasingly aware of the limitations of excluding public participation in heritage management both in terms of their own limited resources and need for wide public political support. This article assesses a pilot project in South Australia to train citizen scientists to record and monitor underwater cultural heritage sites. The results reinforced the need to ensure the data collected is robust and meaningful, and that citizen scientists know their contribution is valid; the need to help citizen scientists interpret data and foster peer-to-peer learning, and highlighted the importance of open source data for site conditions.

show abstract

Expanding use of archaeology in climate change response by changing its social environment

Rockman

Hritz

2020

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate science has outlined targets for reductions of greenhouse gas emissions necessary to provide a substantial chance of avoiding the worst impacts of climate change on both natural and human systems. How to reach those targets, however, requires balancing physical realities of the natural environment with the complexity of the human social environment, including histories, cultures, and values. Archaeology is the study of interactions of natural and social environments through time and across space. As well, the field of cultural resources management, which includes archaeology, regularly engages with values such as site significance and allocation of funding that the modern social environment ascribes to its own history. Through these two approaches, archaeology has potential to provide both data for and methods of addressing challenges the global community faces through climate change. To date, however, archaeology and related areas of cultural heritage have had relatively little role in the global climate response. Here, we assess the social environment of archaeology and climate change and resulting structural barriers that have limited use of archaeology in and for climate change with a case study of the US federal government. On this basis, we provide recommendations to the fields of archaeology and climate response about how to more fully realize the multiple potential uses of archaeology for the challenges of climate change.

show abstract

Coastal erosion and public archaeology in Brittany, France:

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Evaluación de riesgo y vulnerabilidad de montículos indígenas en contextos de producción agropecuaria en la región de India Muerta, Uruguay

Evaluación de riesgo y vulnerabilidad de montículos indígenas en contextos de producción agropecuaria en la región de India Muerta, Uruguay

Going for the win‐win: including the public in underwater cultural heritage management through citizen science in Australia and New Zealand

Expanding use of archaeology in climate change response by changing its social environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About