2000
DOI: 10.1080/00139150009605749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coastal Erosion: Evaluating the Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion achieves the overarching goal of the research. The current study is in line with the findings of other researchers such as Mouat, Lozano, & Bateson (2010) and Dunn, Friedman, & Baish (2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This conclusion achieves the overarching goal of the research. The current study is in line with the findings of other researchers such as Mouat, Lozano, & Bateson (2010) and Dunn, Friedman, & Baish (2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The difficulty of protecting both property and ecosystem function from erosion has been well demonstrated (Boruff, Emrich, and Cutter 2005;Dunn, Friedman, and Baish 2000;Finkl, Benedet, and Campbell 2006;Keeler, Kriesel, and Landry 2003). The construction of seawalls and armoring of the shoreline has proved successful in protecting property and property values in the past, but has resulted in the loss of beaches and wetlands due to coastal squeeze (Good 1994;Good, Weber, and Charland 1999).…”
Section: Impacts On Propertymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many questions have been raised about who should pay for shoreline protection initiatives (Dunn, Friedman, and Baish 2000). Some studies present evidence suggesting that although beaches are valuable resources for entire states, local resort communities should provide a large percentage of the necessary funding needed for protection in order to fairly distribute the costs and benefits.…”
Section: Impacts On Propertymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Though the loss of valuable assets, such as the coastal resources, is well documented, this is not the case with the consequent, indirect or second order losses in economic values that this process entails. Efforts to highlight the economic or value side of the process of coastal change are scattered in a number of reports and studies addressing predominantly North American and to a lesser extend European and Third World coastal resources (David et al 1999, Spurgeon, 1999, Dunn et al 2000, Ledoux and Turner 2002. In a recent meta-review of economic valuation studies of coastal wetlands, Brander et al (2003) observed a wide range in estimated values, with GDP being the most important factor to explain the variance in the data set.…”
Section: Facts and Values In Sustainable Coastal Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%