Coastal Urban Planning in The ‘Green Republic’: Tourism Development and the Nature–Infrastructure Paradox in Costa Rica

Abstract

This article examines coastal urban planning in Costa Rica vis‐à‐vis the country's values in the areas of sustainable tourism and community development, focusing on the city of Jacó. I argue that an anti‐urban tourism development strategy, swift coastal urban development and weak planning have nurtured a nature–infrastructure paradox: when people are brought closer to nature without proper urban and governmental infrastructure, this causes social and environmental damage. To assess this paradox and understand local perceptions of development, I analyzed lengthy semi‐structured interviews and survey responses in San José and Jacó in this study. Research methods also encompassed analysis of current tourism planning institutions and regulations, tourism media coverage and reports, real estate data, participant observation of planning and community meetings and activities, and observations of the built and natural environmental conditions in Jacó and its surroundings. The findings show jurisdictional fragmentation, regulatory weaknesses, complexity, poor coordination, slow action, and incoherent planning and development, leading to environmental degradation and socio‐spatial inequities. A more balanced approach to planning and development would seek to improve environmental health and socio‐spatial equity in tandem, by nurturing and advancing both nature and infrastructure development. Lessons from Jacó have global resonance, given the expansion of the worldwide tourism and second‐home/retirement‐housing industries, their recent concentration in urban coastal destinations of developing countries, and the fragility of these socio‐ecological systems.

Collaboration of Communities and Non-Profit Organizations in Addressing Environmental Problems with African Countries

“…The biogeophysical ecosystem has been impacted by the loss of polar ice, increasing sea water quality, desert extension, intensified rain and floods, climate change, disappearance of flora and fauna, and migration of fauna and pests (Ai et al, 2008;Williams, 2014;Brochier & Ramieri, 2001). Impact on the community's socioeconomic activities: destruction of the coast and coastal towns, disruption of path, port, and airport infrastructure functions (Chang, 2016;Deshmukh, 2010;Petterson et al, 2006;Irazábal, 2018;Zsamboky et al, 2011). Disruption of human settlements and agricultural production Risk of cancer and disease outbreaks was increased…”

Friendly Locals and Clean Streets?—Evaluating Jakarta’s Destination Brand Image

“…There is a growing body of knowledge related to the influence of the destination image on tourist behavior [18,[50][51][52]. It has been shown that destinations with strong positive images are more likely to be considered and chosen in the travel decision process [53], even if the destination image influences more than just the destination selection process, such as general tourist behaviors. Qu et al's [24] study showed that there are two key elements of tourist behavior that merit further analysis, namely intentions to revisit and recommend the destination.…”

How Eco is Eco-Tourism? A Systematic Assessment of Resorts on the Red Sea, Egypt

“…Cater [19] critiqued eco-tourism in developing countries, arguing that without adequate understanding of environmental factors and without careful planning and management, it was likely to produce unsustainable outcomes. Irazábal [20] argued that bringing people to nature without appropriate planning and infrastructure would cause more harm than good to the natural resources. Lindberg and McKercher [21] argued that as eco-tourism ventures reached a stage of maturity and popularity, they inevitably degrade environments, and concluded that the promised benefits of eco-tourism are not actually in evidence.…”