2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12193270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coastal Wetland Classification with Deep U-Net Convolutional Networks and Sentinel-2 Imagery: A Case Study at the Tien Yen Estuary of Vietnam

Abstract: The natural wetland areas in Vietnam, which are transition areas from inland and ocean, play a crucial role in minimizing coastal hazards; however, during the last two decades, about 64% of these areas have been converted from the natural wetland to the human-made wetland. It is anticipated that the conversion rate continues to increase due to economic development and urbanization. Therefore, monitoring and assessment of the wetland are essential for the coastal vulnerability assessment and geo-ecosystem manag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, U-Net has shown to outperform SVM and RF classifications for wetland mapping using Sentinel-2 10 m imagery. [31] discovered that the SVM and RT classifiers only achieved an OA of 50.5% and 46.4%, respectively, while the U-Net classifier regularly reached at least 85%, depending on the optimizing function used. Our study suggests the higher resolution NAIP imagery includes enough spatial detail to improve the OA to the detected levels of accuracy (e.g., U-Net = 92.4%; SVM = 81.6; RT = 75.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, U-Net has shown to outperform SVM and RF classifications for wetland mapping using Sentinel-2 10 m imagery. [31] discovered that the SVM and RT classifiers only achieved an OA of 50.5% and 46.4%, respectively, while the U-Net classifier regularly reached at least 85%, depending on the optimizing function used. Our study suggests the higher resolution NAIP imagery includes enough spatial detail to improve the OA to the detected levels of accuracy (e.g., U-Net = 92.4%; SVM = 81.6; RT = 75.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the classification of the image itself took 43 hours and 23 minutes for a total of 46 hours and 22 minutes. The length of classification is not a common finding, however, as U-net classifiers have been found to be faster than many others in remote sensing applications [30][31]58]. The authors suggest the extra length of time required to complete classification was due to the machine specifications, the size of the dataset, and the methods by which the tiles were classified and subsequently mosaicked together.…”
Section: Comparison Of Model Performance and Accuraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The architecture of the network can be divided into two halves-an encoding or 'contracting" side and decoding or "expansive" side-that give the architecture its "u" shape. The U-Net algorithm has shown success in classifying coastal wetlands, using the remotely-sensed imagery in previous studies [30,31]. SVM and RF classifiers are commonly used ML classifiers for remote sensing analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complex ecological conditions of wetlands and the spatial and temporal limitations of field investigations, remote sensing technology has become an important means of wetland mapping and monitoring. Despite the success of optical satellite data in applications such as wetland detection and water level monitoring [3][4][5], optical images are less useful in coastal areas due to cloud cover [6]. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), which provides valuable geophysical parameters over intertidal zones in all-weather and daylight-independent conditions [7][8][9], has emerged as a promising tool for wetland monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%