2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2017.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coastal wetland vegetation community classification and distribution across environmental gradients throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the four species in the ecotone of both lakes were recorded as the common species. Less number of common species might be due to two lakes situated in the different geographic and climatic region (Lemein et al, 2017). Jaccard's similarity index was found to be 3.44% which clearly showed that the communities under studies i.e.…”
Section: State Of Ecotone Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only the four species in the ecotone of both lakes were recorded as the common species. Less number of common species might be due to two lakes situated in the different geographic and climatic region (Lemein et al, 2017). Jaccard's similarity index was found to be 3.44% which clearly showed that the communities under studies i.e.…”
Section: State Of Ecotone Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The spatial distinction of communities demonstrated that the riparian vegetation zone constituted an internally differentiated ecotone (Klosowski, 1993). Both the lakes were found dominated by native plants (Lemein et al, 2017) but at Begnas lake an invasive species of Eichhornia crassipes is also present. As E. crassipes stands the worst aquatic weed throughout the tropics and subtropics, increasing of E. crassipes is a sign of the increase in cultural eutrophication and siltation.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bulrush occur throughout the Great Lakes basin; thus, this trend likely reflects lower anthropogenic disturbance (water quality impairments among other potential disturbances) in the northern regions compared with southern regions. Bulrush zones may also be prevalent in higher quality northern sites because they are outside the area of Phragmites invasion at northern latitudes and because bulrushes tolerate the low nutrient concentrations that inhibit both Phragmites and Typha dominance (Albert and Minc 2004;Lemein et al 2017). This latitudinal trend may explain the lower overall variability in rank values within the bulrush zones compared to the high variability in the five vegetation zones with the lowest average rank values: Lily, PSP, Phragmites, SAV, and Typha.…”
Section: Basin-wide Water Quality Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors would restrain vegetation restoration of degraded wetlands, including water supplement (Guo et al, 2017), nutrient availability (Mitchell et al, 2015), cultivation period (Barrett and Watmough, 2015), seed banks (Liu et al, 2005;Bai et al, 2014), restoration time and so on (Lemein et al, 2017). Usually, vegetation would be more and more similar with target wetlands as restoration time increasing.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Restoration Of Vegetation In Reclaimedmentioning
confidence: 99%